Currently sitting at #8 in draft order...who should we pick?

[45catfan]

42 minutes ago, RumHam said:

We need to trade up to four for a legitimate tackle. Lions don't need one. Jags will just take another qb

Nah, we should b able get LT #2 or #3 unless a team trades ahead of us.  Some stud DEs in this draft and that will eat up a couple of picks ahead of us.

[Mr. Scot]

8 minutes ago, bobcat91 said:

Get a LT like Charles Cross in the 1st. Plays in a passing offense and gave up 1 sack and 6 pressures in 500 plus passing attempts.

 

Trade into the second and get the Nevada QB, Strong.

 

Use everything else for OL 

Several of the mocks that I've seen have Cross as the best offensive lineman available at the spot where we're likely to be picking.

[kungfoodude]

Cross, Neal, Ekonwu.....give me any of them.

[45catfan]

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Cross, Neal, Ekonwu.....give me any of them.

Preach it brother!

[Scott12345]

Take the center from Iowa…the interior of our OL is the first place to start 

And yes we need a QB, too bad we don’t have a second rounder

id Trade down if we can get a 1st and 2nd

[mc52beast]

Can we give our #1 for a competent HC? If Rhule stays it won’t matter who we draft, he’ll ruin him.

[kungfoodude]

2 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Take the center from Iowa…the interior of our OL is the first place to start 

And yes we need a QB, too bad we don’t have a second rounder

id Trade down if we can get a 1st and 2nd

I am 100% in on that dude but we actually will probably be picking ahead of his range. If we fug up and accidentally win another game, he is the guy. 

[jb2288]

Pickett or Corral (whichever ends up the consensus 1st QB after the combine). If gone, Charles Cross 

[Scott12345]

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am 100% in on that dude but we actually will probably be picking ahead of his range. If we fug up and accidentally win another game, he is the guy. 

Take him anyway…we’ve got to fix the interior of our OL

[SetfreexX]

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

trade back 

This is the only logical option, we don't have a 2nd or 3rd, we need to trade back and acquire multiple picks. Spend money on a PROVEN tackle if available, and use the picks to supplement the interior OL where there's usually more options, unless a Tackle falls to our new pick via trade back. 

Since this is logical, we'll likely draft a LB'er. 

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

This is the only logical option, we don't have a 2nd or 3rd, we need to trade back and acquire multiple picks. Spend money on a PROVEN tackle if available, and use the picks to supplement the interior OL where there's usually more options, unless a Tackle falls to our new pick via trade back. 

Since this is logical, we'll likely draft a LB'er. 

Sigh.

 

Its not logical if you try and force it and not get value.  For us to trade back someone has to fall in love with a qb and then blow us away with an offer.  I just dont see it this draft.  Its top heavy with lineman and motherfuger we have to capitalize on it

[kungfoodude]

13 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Pickett or Corral (whichever ends up the consensus 1st QB after the combine). If gone, Charles Cross 

No QB reaching, thanks. 

I will say that I need to look at this WKU kid. Maybe he is the guy?

[kungfoodude]

12 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

Take him anyway…we’ve got to fix the interior of our OL

Well....positional value. If you can get a 10+ year LT, that is worth so much.

[45catfan]

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

No QB reaching, thanks. 

I will say that I need to look at this WKU kid. Maybe he is the guy?

He's a day 3 prospect at this point,  we've got plenty of those picks to burn on a project QB.