Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Came here to see if Rhule was fired yet

RumHam

By RumHam,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

SetfreexX Mentor

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted

To be fair, most of this staff is Rhule guys so even firing him now who would you promote. He's going down with the ship, and I feel it will be reset in the off-season, let the GM do his damn job. 

Rhule had two years to ''build his program'' it's in the same state it was to end last year, the OL is bad all over again, and he's throwing the starting QB under the bus again. Anyone watching unbiasedly could argue the team has regressed under him. We had DJ - 1K +, Robbie 1K +, Curtis Samuel 1K plus combined yards.  + ,and Mike Davis 1K plus combined yards on offense last season. 

Now the only one sniffing that is DJ, and some fans have the nerve to critique his ability when he's been the only real consistent threat on offense this year. 

CMC stays nicked up, and the staff keeps trotting our Erving like he's ''All NFL'' the one time I saw Deonte Brown on the field he was man handling a guy, and even if Christensen is inexperienced, he can't have less upside than Erving. 

This offense has just been mishandled completely, and to be fair the defense is fairly impressive and would likely be even more so if the offense was not so inept. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

Got to give him until the end of the year. Like someone mentioned, the entire staff are his friends so firing him now would just promote an even lesser qualified version of himself. He is a dead man walking though. 
 

From top to bottom, this is without a doubt, collectively the worst coaching staff in panthers history. Learn from this And don’t let it happen again. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RumHam Veteran

RumHam

Posted
  • Author
Posted

He seems too worried about limiting the playbook for these QBs so they learn the system? Cam did change that call on 4th down yesterday, which was fine IMO. But they sniffed it out and he basically threw it like he did to avoid an INT. Which means they knew the play call. That reverse was nice. Shula did that poo too much though, but we don't do anything outside of hitch, slant, RPO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...