Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Bringing back Rhule. Planning to start OC search next week


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anyone who thought Matt rhule would be gone is delusional. You don't sign him to a 7 year deal and let him go after 2 seasons. He was always hired to build a competitive culture and rebuild the team, hence the 7 year contract. He took a couple years to rebuild the programs at Baylor and Temple. It just happened the panthers came out competitive this season so the mantra shifted from rebuild to competing, but that got shot down real quick. Rebuilds don't happen overnight and I want rhule gone now, but fact of the matter is, this guy is here for a while. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chosen Newton said:

Anyone who thought Matt rhule would be gone is delusional. You don't sign him to a 7 year deal and let him go after 2 seasons. He was always hired to build a competitive culture and rebuild the team, hence the 7 year contract. He took a couple years to rebuild the programs at Baylor and Temple. It just happened the panthers came out competitive this season so the mantra shifted from rebuild to competing, but that got shot down real quick. Rebuilds don't happen overnight and I want rhule gone now, but fact of the matter is, this guy is here for a while. 

Spot on my man 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chosen Newton said:

Anyone who thought Matt rhule would be gone is delusional. You don't sign him to a 7 year deal and let him go after 2 seasons. He was always hired to build a competitive culture and rebuild the team, hence the 7 year contract. He took a couple years to rebuild the programs at Baylor and Temple. It just happened the panthers came out competitive this season so the mantra shifted from rebuild to competing, but that got shot down real quick. Rebuilds don't happen overnight and I want rhule gone now, but fact of the matter is, this guy is here for a while. 

Look at me! I'm "rebuilding"!

demolition-crash.gif

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chosen Newton said:

Anyone who thought Matt rhule would be gone is delusional. You don't sign him to a 7 year deal and let him go after 2 seasons. He was always hired to build a competitive culture and rebuild the team, hence the 7 year contract. He took a couple years to rebuild the programs at Baylor and Temple. It just happened the panthers came out competitive this season so the mantra shifted from rebuild to competing, but that got shot down real quick. Rebuilds don't happen overnight and I want rhule gone now, but fact of the matter is, this guy is here for a while. 

I haven't seen much of anybody say he would be gone.

I've seen plenty suggest that he should.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chosen Newton said:

Anyone who thought Matt rhule would be gone is delusional. You don't sign him to a 7 year deal and let him go after 2 seasons. He was always hired to build a competitive culture and rebuild the team, hence the 7 year contract. He took a couple years to rebuild the programs at Baylor and Temple. It just happened the panthers came out competitive this season so the mantra shifted from rebuild to competing, but that got shot down real quick. Rebuilds don't happen overnight and I want rhule gone now, but fact of the matter is, this guy is here for a while. 

Want to buy my season tickets from me bro? Actually, Ill give them away. You can give them back to me in 7 years after Rhule's "rebuild," because I think we have totally different definitions of what a rebuild looks like. 

Edited by Jared Patterson
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Rhule and Tepper are supposed to be having an end of season meeting to hash things out, so this seems premature.

Plausible scenario though 😣

Unfortunately we know Tepper isn't going to can Rhule. Bright side is my to do list will be shorter without football in the picture. Probably won't even watch the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, unicar15 said:

Trading for Watson and not upgrading the line I’m convinced would be a huge mistake. They have to figure out a way to do both and the only way you upgrade this line is with 1st round picks. So you better figure out a way to parlay Burns, Brown, CMC into another 1st round pick. 

Watson was amazing behind some awful lines in Houston. But doubt he’d okay a trade, so kind of moot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN's Jeremy Fowler reports Matt Rhule will return as Carolina's head coach in 2022. 

It's a body blow for a Panthers fanbase sick of Rhule's underperorming and constant talk of his process at work while coaching one of the NFL's worst teams. Carolina fans chanted "fire Rhule" during the team's most recent home game; even fans at a recent Charlotte Hornets game chanted for Rhule's firing. The Panthers have flailed back and forth in search of a franchise quarterback since Rhule was hired, and still have no answers under center (and a hefty bill for Sam Darnold's services in 2022). Rhule, 46, is 10-22 as Carolina's head coach. The Athletic's Joseph Person in December reported Panthers owner David Tepper was "unhappy and embarrassed" by the team's 2021 performance, and players were quoted anonymously criticizing Rhule's nonstop micromanaging. An agent who represents several Carolina players told The Athletic there are Panthers players from Baylor and Temple -- Rhule's former college teams -- who wouldn't make an NFL roster anywhere else. Tepper is on record saying he hired Rhule in part because they dress alike and both men had experience as short-order cooks. The Panthers will wait until after the 2022 season to fire the former college coach. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...