Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers need to go out and beat Tampa

Shocker

By Shocker,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, beo said:

Positional value isn't particularly hard to understand. Unfortunately, a lot of people put it on a pedestal over all else regardless of what's going on on the field. Are you suggesting that we should keep Reddick at probably at least 15m per season solely because he plays EDGE? That might make sense in a 3-4 base with big interior linemen but that's not what defense we run. Our DEs get pushed so far to the outside that it leaves big holes open inside and it's a fundamental issue with our defense that teams have caught on to. It's the main reason our run D sucks. 

It's a balancing act and we simply don't have the cap space to tie up into Reddick given what we're seeing on the field as of late.

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

1641524796629.thumb.jpg.d0b6caa25ed7d08e6365591f9e1c45e7.jpg

 

They could lose draft status???? If not the the past two seasons of meaningless out-of playoffs late season wins; the panthers would have penei sewell and justin herbert. 

I repeat PENEI SEWELL AND JUSTIN HERBERT WOULD BE PANTHERS!

You still have tards defending that...insane!

 

 

So fuggin hilarious that you want two players that were not available after the fact,  we aren’t in that situation studbolt.  What about picking Tom Brady #1 way back when

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Shocker said:

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

#1 priority should be building an OL and QB.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Shocker said:

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

I think it would be cheaper to keep Burns, Haynes, and Luvu as edge rushers.

Reddick is going to be in the 16-18 million per year range and we need a MLB, OL and QB. 

Unless you want to be back here bitching about the OL again next year, he probably needs to go.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I think it would be cheaper to keep Burns, Haynes, and Luvu as edge rushers.

Reddick is going to be in the 16-18 million per year range and we need a MLB, OL and QB. 

Unless you want to be back here bitching about the OL again next year, he probably needs to go.

Naw…we can resign him.  No way we should let him go.  OL will get filled but Reddick is a different dude

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So…9 assholes don’t want us to win tomorrow.  Nice sample

We won a meaningless game last year. We beat WFT. Man that was a great win. It meant so much. It only cost us draft position and we missed out on a franchise LT Rhule would have actually drafted. Boy that feel good game no one is going to give 2 shits about ever again vs a LT for the next 10 years is definitely worth it though. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Shocker said:

They are down weapons like crazy and to be honest losing to us crushes their repeat dreams.  Lets go fug them up

Losing to us doesn't really mean a damned thing. Any given Sunday!  

We've lost to worse teams without weapons; remember when the lowly Giants beat our ass? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...