Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers need to go out and beat Tampa


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, beo said:

Positional value isn't particularly hard to understand. Unfortunately, a lot of people put it on a pedestal over all else regardless of what's going on on the field. Are you suggesting that we should keep Reddick at probably at least 15m per season solely because he plays EDGE? That might make sense in a 3-4 base with big interior linemen but that's not what defense we run. Our DEs get pushed so far to the outside that it leaves big holes open inside and it's a fundamental issue with our defense that teams have caught on to. It's the main reason our run D sucks. 

It's a balancing act and we simply don't have the cap space to tie up into Reddick given what we're seeing on the field as of late.

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

1641524796629.thumb.jpg.d0b6caa25ed7d08e6365591f9e1c45e7.jpg

 

They could lose draft status???? If not the the past two seasons of meaningless out-of playoffs late season wins; the panthers would have penei sewell and justin herbert. 

I repeat PENEI SEWELL AND JUSTIN HERBERT WOULD BE PANTHERS!

You still have tards defending that...insane!

 

 

So fuggin hilarious that you want two players that were not available after the fact,  we aren’t in that situation studbolt.  What about picking Tom Brady #1 way back when

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Shocker said:

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

#1 priority should be building an OL and QB.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Shocker said:

We can resign Reddick and seriously he is our #1 priority.  The defense takes a huge step back without him.  I would franchise him if need be

I think it would be cheaper to keep Burns, Haynes, and Luvu as edge rushers.

Reddick is going to be in the 16-18 million per year range and we need a MLB, OL and QB. 

Unless you want to be back here bitching about the OL again next year, he probably needs to go.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I think it would be cheaper to keep Burns, Haynes, and Luvu as edge rushers.

Reddick is going to be in the 16-18 million per year range and we need a MLB, OL and QB. 

Unless you want to be back here bitching about the OL again next year, he probably needs to go.

Naw…we can resign him.  No way we should let him go.  OL will get filled but Reddick is a different dude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So…9 assholes don’t want us to win tomorrow.  Nice sample

We won a meaningless game last year. We beat WFT. Man that was a great win. It meant so much. It only cost us draft position and we missed out on a franchise LT Rhule would have actually drafted. Boy that feel good game no one is going to give 2 shits about ever again vs a LT for the next 10 years is definitely worth it though. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shocker said:

They are down weapons like crazy and to be honest losing to us crushes their repeat dreams.  Lets go fug them up

Losing to us doesn't really mean a damned thing. Any given Sunday!  

We've lost to worse teams without weapons; remember when the lowly Giants beat our ass? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...