Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At number 6 the Carolina Panthers select...Charles Cross???


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 45catfan said:

Last year's QB class was far from weak, actually one of the better ones in recent memory.  This QB class has question marks all over the place. 

You will be making this exact same post this time next year as is huddle tradition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Growl said:

If the panthers had done it the other way around last draft, if they had taken the QB presented to them despite it being deemed a “weak class,” the panthers would have the most important position on the field solidified and an open venue of top picks to select from

you could take a LT, you could also take a premiere edge rusher who can actually set the edge and not have to overpay Hassan reddick, or you could’ve taken the CB now

You never pass on a top QB prospects when you have a need a QB. You only delay your ability to properly assess where your roster is.

it would be great to be talking one of these guys-one of these “can’t miss” tackles will certainly be there past pick #12 or so-but you can’t keep doubling down on the same mistake.

 

it’s time to draft a QB.

Who do you want at 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I say slide back. I think 2 or 3 Edge rushers, a CB, and an OL are likely to go before us.   If there are 4 OL we would consider at #6, drop back, add a second rounder, and take the one still on the board.

However, Ekwonu is (to me) the best for us.  He can play G or T.  He is the most feared lineman in the ACC.  Call him IHOP for obvious reasons.   If BC improves at LT, Ekwonu can go to G.  If Brady goes to G, Ekwonu can play LT.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Who do you want at 6

I’m sorry was that not clearly demonstrated

the team has to acquire a franchise QB instead of getting sucked into this illusory approach of “just making sure we come away with a good player”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Very young and the most unpolished of the 3 top LTs.   That said, I'd still take him if Neal and Ekwonu are gone.  Yes, early mocks have 1, if not 2 OTs gone by our pick at #6.

In with the meme:  "Don't know you all the players will be picked top 5!" nonsense!

It's still a QB driven league, and there are still a lot of teams looking for their QB1.  And there are two amazing pass rushers who could go top three.

I have no idea what will happen, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

 I say slide back. I think 2 or 3 Edge rushers, a CB, and an OL are likely to go before us.   If there are 4 OL we would consider at #6, drop back, add a second rounder, and take the one still on the board.

However, Ekwonu is (to me) the best for us.  He can play G or T.  He is the most feared lineman in the ACC.  Call him IHOP for obvious reasons.   If BC improves at LT, Ekwonu can go to G.  If Brady goes to G, Ekwonu can play LT.

There is one HUGE problem with trading back and that is the Jets and Giants.  Both have TWO high picks right around us, so if anyone is looking to trade up, I'm sure those will be the first two teams on the phone.  If you are the Jets and Giants, why wouldn't you trade back with first rounders nearly stacked on top of one another only to acquire more draft capital?

In short, we are not in a great place to trade back.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...