Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pep Hamilton is top choice for OC now


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

How does Pep feel about that?

Does this bring us closer to having to deal with a Watson trade and that aftermath? 

Please god no, last thing I want is a Watson trade.

Sure, I'd love for him to be our QB, him and CMC would be a dangerous combo in the backfield.  But the cost is just FAR too high, it would cost us our first rounder this year and likely the next 2 years, and still possibly more on top.

We need to use that first rounder on an OT this year, and without our 2nd or 3rd rounders this year, I'm not on board for giving up 3 first rounders for a QB on a huge contract, hard pass.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also found it utterly depressing that the GM made sure note it was Rhule’s hire.   Not his.  He was there if Matt wanted input but Matt doesn’t know offense Rhule is picking the OC. 
 

what exactly is the point of Fitt? Tepper could save some money and not have a fake GM.  Rhule is a bad version of Bill O’Brien. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Also found it utterly depressing that the GM made sure note it was Rhule’s hire.   Not his.  He was there if Matt wanted input but Matt doesn’t know offense is picking the OC. 
 

what exactly is the point of Fitt? Tepper could save some money and not have a fake GM.  Rhule is a bad version of Bill O’Brien. 

Right man that's why I was confused when you didn't believe Rhule had that power earlier because they've already said it before. It is whack af though regardless...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Many of you are trashing the "run first" approach to offense.  Tennessee has a bye this week. 

Last 3 years how many Tenn type teams have made the postseason? 

they are the exception to the rule.   Those always exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Right man that's why I was confused when you didn't believe Rhule had that power earlier because they've already said it before. It is whack af though regardless...

Didn’t believe it.  Do now.  
 

Team is hopeless.  Tepper is going to kill this team and then move it once they have to put tarps over the empty seats.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CRA said:

Didn’t believe it.  Do now.  
 

Team is hopeless.  Tepper is going to kill this team and then move it once they have to put tarps over the empty seats.  

Yea you were just thinking along the lines of:
"There's no way this idiot gave a shitty college coach that power, pfff who the fug does that"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Killah_Ray said:

If we bring in Pep, only thing that tells me is we're going all in for Watson...

 

Which means we're fuged....

Pep doesn’t have a relationship with Watson.   Pep was only in Hou this season.   

and there is zero indication Watson wants to come here.   We know he would waive his trade clause for us. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

last year had 4.

1. Ten
2. CLE
3. Bal
4. WASH

2019 had 3

1. Ten
2. SF
3. Bal 

4 of the 14

3 of the 12

with teams built around the QB taking home the rings.   

that doesn’t scream you should be building your team like the Titans in 2022.  

I just don’t see the point do not building your team in favor of the rules.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...