Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule set to appear on WFNZ Thursday morning


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

So don’t know if anyone caught this but near 17:50 mark of the interview he’s talking about BC and this upcoming draft. He says whatever Panthers decide to do at #6 in the draft. Is that me or should he be saying who we decide to take in this years draft? 

Nah he is passing blame.  He did that a few times in the interview.  It wasnt conspicuous. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, trueblade said:

In case you are out of the area and didn't hear the interview, he's what Rhule said about Slater.

 

As @Zod said, I too, am less confident in Rhule than I was yesterday.

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

He said it was too high for a guard.  So fug him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

I have trouble thinking anything Rhule says is honest/transparent at this point. Dude has zero credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

People seem to be leaving this part out of the thread.

I like that he admitted making a mistake with how he played BC but I also liked how he said he didn't want to David Carr BC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Again, I have no clue what this moron was thinking when he said that.  That is literally the worst possible answer he could have given.

Honestly its so bad and getting so much national attention from players and personel it's embarrassing. It is all over my twitter feed from national reporters and entities.

Edited by thunderraiden
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thunderraiden said:

Honestly its so bad and getting so much national attention from players and personel it's embarrassing. It is all over my twitter feed from national reporters.

As soon as I heard it and posted it I figured people were going to have a field day with it.  Hopefully it shames the motherfuger into drafting a tackle at 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He would have cut Sam Mills.  Seriously-as a player, I imagine that he was told things like, "you are too small, too short, too slow, etc."  He now applies these idealistic measurables to players and it is blinding him.

Matt Rhule and Marty Hurney are at opposite ends of the spectrum on this.

Rhule is unable to see that certain players who don't fit the ideal "checkboxes" often have intangibles and other factors that make them very good players.

By contrast, Marty looked at non-ideal players and saw those intangibles and other factors when they weren't actually there.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aho…come out and prove me wrong boy. 
    • I mean, I hear what y'all are saying, but Derrick could have been positive without being negative.  He essentially accused people of not seeing Bryce's improvement because of their desire to not be wrong. He could've kept it about Bryce and the team. For example, he could've said: "Bryce has made strides, and we believe in him. This coming season, his continued improvement will turn a lot of people into believers."  That would've been supportive of his teammate and sent a message to the doubters. That being said, his tact almost summoned and left the door ajar for more skepticism. That's my take anyway. Bryce has improved from the bottom to perhaps skirting the line between the bottom third and mid-third at best...after three seasons. We've all seen it. Yay! In my mind, Bryce has still got a long way to go and a short time to get there, but my expectations are top five--at least top 10--always! Yes, I am a fan, so there's that, but I don't believe it's unreasonable to expect excellence. Hopefully the Panthers FO has the same mindset (and that doesn't even necessarily have anything to do with what we gave up to acquire him). That is the lens I'm looking through. Derrick Brown has his homer glasses on. He just needs to be more diplomatic and thoughtful with his words in my opinion, but I get it that he's a good teammate.
    • I have no doubt the Canes will come out like gangbusters, huge bounce back from game one - my only concern is Freddie, if he lets in a couple of softies and Dobes stays hot we could be in trouble.
×
×
  • Create New...