Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Multiple analysts ridiculing Rhule's comments


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, CRA said:

I can’t name one. 
 

at least other bad teams have some hope they can hand their hat on.  New coaches coming in.  And basically every bad team minus the Giants finished with on the upswing.  

Yeah at least Jacksonville has their future franchise QB.  The Jets have a lot of good young pieces on the o line, and also their future franchise QB.  The Lions ended the season very strong and have a really good coach, IMO.  We have absolutely jack poo.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

I dont want this idiot making our picks this year, Ive been a big proponent of wanting to trade down but what is the point if all those picks will just be wasted. Pray that Neal guy from Bama is available at 6 and at least we can come out of this draft with a solid new LT.

I want Neal BADLY.  Unfortunately, I think that is a pipe dream at best.  Hes probably going 1 overall to the Jags.  Definitely won't make it past the Giants ahead of us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Evil Hurney said:

What exactly is controversial about Rhule's comments?

It's not "controversial" so much as it is just plain stupid.  He's simply doubling down on the same stupid things he's been saying all season long regarding his evaluations of players.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

It's not "controversial" so much as it is just plain stupid.  He's simply doubling down on the same stupid things he's been saying all season long regarding his evaluations of players.

I see it more as he's explaining the decision making process at the time in regards to "why not Slater". 

Anyone paying attention should also take note that those comments indicate the Panthers won't take IOL in the top 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Evil Hurney said:

I see it more as he's explaining the decision making process at the time in regards to "why not Slater". 

Anyone paying attention should also take note that those comments indicate the Panthers won't take IOL in the top 10.

Yes, he explained the decision making process.

And based on what we've learned since the decision was made, it's pretty clear the process was...wrong.

(and I'm being generous)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...