Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This HC Rhule guy is just downright embarrassing


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Rubi said:

Yes. Me and everyone else including tv analysts need more context ? What ? Lol 

Yes you do..

He was being honest didn't say Slater was a bad player at all.. But reality is most or alot of scouts and draft analysis saw Slater as a guard...

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/rashawn-slater/3200534c-4144-1272-10c5-fd1a6fe0f889

https://thedraftnetwork.com/player/rashawn-slater/1pKUn4IfC4

https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2931232-rashawn-slater-nfl-draft-2021-scouting-report-for-los-angeles-chargers-ot.amp.html

He proved alot of ppl wrong but hindsight is 20/20.. But at no point in the interview did he trash Slater..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rubi said:

With all due respect he questioned his size, position , and even threw in the QB he blocked for was mobile - for a little cherry on top 

This isn’t complicated. The fact I’m even having to explain it to you LOL

So did Half the scouting and draft analysts community... So did half the guys on the 4 man Rush (who posted the Twitter breakdown) When they thought Darwasaw would be the better OT of the 2... When they were doing their pre draft analysis...

But it's funny how the fake astonishment when they thought the same thing...

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Yes you do..

He was being honest didn't say Slater was a bad player at all.. But reality is most or alot of scouts and draft analysis saw Slater as a guard...

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/rashawn-slater/3200534c-4144-1272-10c5-fd1a6fe0f889

https://thedraftnetwork.com/player/rashawn-slater/1pKUn4IfC4

https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2931232-rashawn-slater-nfl-draft-2021-scouting-report-for-los-angeles-chargers-ot.amp.html

He proved alot of ppl wrong but hindsight is 20/20.. But at no point in the interview did he trash Slater..

He didn't trash him, but he intimated that he was better than advertised because of Herbert's mobility. That's a bad look into itself, but he threw it out there after a somewhat weak attempt to rationalize his whiff. It was clownish. I'd respect Rhule more if he admitted his mistakes as opposed to trying to justify everything. He talks as though he's some accomplished head coach in the league that everyone should listen to because he's that guy. I don't see any humility in this guy, and that's a problem for a coach that ain't done poo except make a lot of questionable if not outright bad decisions. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

He didn't trash him, but he intimated that he was better than advertised because of his Herbert's mobility. That's a bad look into itself, but he threw it out there after a somewhat weak attempt to rationalize his whiff. It was clownish. I'd respect Rhule more if he admitted his mistakes as opposed to trying to justify everything. He talks as though he's some accomplished head coach in the league that everyone should listen to because he's that guy. I don't see any humility in this guy, and that's a problem for a coach that ain't done poo except make a lot of questionable if not outright bad decisions. 

He was being honest and that is clownish now?? 

Honest question is it a Wiff if Jaycee doesn't get hurt and plays at the level he was going before the freak injury???

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rubi said:

With all due respect he questioned his size, position , and even threw in the QB he blocked for was mobile - for a little cherry on top 

This isn’t complicated. The fact I’m even having to explain it to you LOL

Here is what he said,

“Yeah, that was a really harder decision. You know like, Rashawn had not played the prior year…um, he wasn’t ideal tackle size… there was a lotta questions of whether he was a guard…same thing with like Alijah Vera-Tucker… so it was really like, “Hey are you going to take a guy that was kind of like a guard at this number(draft position)?” You  know I think with Rashawn, I had a chance to go back and watch cause he is playing out with the Chargers with a really mobile quarterback….”

However, if you go back and listen to it you would know that right before that statement and after being prompted about Slater, he said that if he had to do it again he would take Jaycee each time as he believes  that Jaycee is going to be a star player and pro bowler.

Not once did he say that he did not like Slater.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

He was being honest and that is clownish now?? 

Honest question is it a Wiff if Jaycee doesn't get hurt and plays at the level he was going before the freak injury???

 

The O-line should've been the priority. I get that some people questioned Slater's projected ability in the league regarding OT, but many did not! Many considered him the more sure NFL-ready OT. As crappy as our line was on paper, investing in Slater was very rational (if not the play). 

Looking at how Slater has actually panned out, and how Rhule tries to downplay his skill after the fact is clownish. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

The O-line should've been the priority. I get that some people questioned Slater's projected ability in the league regarding OT, but many did not! Many considered him the more sure NFL-ready OT. As crappy as our line was on paper, investing in Slater was very rational (if not the play). 

Looking at how Slater has actually panned out, and how Rhule tries to downplay his skill after the fact is clownish. 

 

 

 

 

Oline should have been a Priority ... Yes we got that.. But so was Secondary.. Especially when last year we couldn't stop any passing team.. 

Ppl keep playing the hindsight 20/20 game now when their opinion wasn't the same before.. Draft night this board was happy about the Horn pick and only ppl who wanted Fields made their opinion known..

Ppl were just as mad about giving up 3rd and anything last season as they did with the blocking situation..

And reality check almost nobody questioned Horn being a shut down Cb.. You had most analysts calling him Jaylen Ramsey 2.0...

Last he could have lied and said thrown his scouting department and Fitt under the bus.. But he didn't.. He didn't trash Slater all he did was told the truth about what they were thinking 9 months ago.. They didn't have the necromancer ability to see that Slater would be a pro bowler.. How can you blame them for going with the higher rated player at a position if need?? That's what you want your team to do when drafting.. Instead of drafting a lower rated player based on perceived higher need..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...