Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Mills makes the Hall of Fame


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Seymour does not deserve to be in the HOF. Should've been Torry Holt instead.

Richard Seymour was a solid DT but In my opinion not really a HOF DT. 
 

Tony Boselli - Um ok I just remember him being hurt all the time. Would probably take Jordan Gross over him. 
 

cliff Branch - never heard of him 

LeRoy Butler - another guy I’d lump in with Boselli and Seymour. Very good players but nothing special I can remember about them. 

Dick Vermiel - seems like a class act and a gentleman but this looks like when the Acadmey gives an honorary Oscar to a really old actor  

Bryant Young - agree with this one. Thought he would have been in already. Dominant player. 
 

Sam Mills - ok 

 

IMHO - this is the weakest HOF class I’ve seen that I have actually paid attention to. I’ll concede Young but the eye test looks like this class deserves to be in the “hall of very good” and not the hall of fame. I’m sure some nerd like Scott will interject and tell me about some fumble recover Butler had or post a clip of Boselli pancaking people and call me stupid. 
 

No disrespect to any of these guys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

Correct. Steve Smith will be our first drafted player select to the HOF.

I actually think Peppers is going to be the first.   Peppers gets eligible in 2024 and I think he is going in first ballot.  

I think 89 is going to take a while.  Too many WRs in the same general range.  None of the WRs from group of guys got in this year.  Some had already been up for consideration before 89.  So I think WRs are slowly going get in just because there are going to be so many with comparable resumes.   89 gets in.  But I think there are going to let some of those guys with rings in before him. 

Peppers won't have the positional competition that 89 has. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

If a declaration was required he'd probably go in as a Saint...

image.thumb.png.1a25b3110e68e62bb1596c57d81f7032.png

In all honesty I'd probably have him in twice if a team designation had to be made. First as a mostly Saints player and then a second time for pretty much being the whole foundation for the Panthers as a coach. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/11/2022 at 1:56 PM, 4Corners said:

Richard Seymour was a solid DT but In my opinion not really a HOF DT. 
 

Tony Boselli - Um ok I just remember him being hurt all the time. Would probably take Jordan Gross over him. 
 

cliff Branch - never heard of him 

LeRoy Butler - another guy I’d lump in with Boselli and Seymour. Very good players but nothing special I can remember about them. 

Dick Vermiel - seems like a class act and a gentleman but this looks like when the Acadmey gives an honorary Oscar to a really old actor  

Bryant Young - agree with this one. Thought he would have been in already. Dominant player. 
 

Sam Mills - ok 

 

IMHO - this is the weakest HOF class I’ve seen that I have actually paid attention to. I’ll concede Young but the eye test looks like this class deserves to be in the “hall of very good” and not the hall of fame. I’m sure some nerd like Scott will interject and tell me about some fumble recover Butler had or post a clip of Boselli pancaking people and call me stupid. 
 

No disrespect to any of these guys 

Again, congrats to Sam Mills, well deserved!

Looking at your list it is crazy to me that another finalist LB, Zach Thomas didn't get in over several of them

Edited by TheProcess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...