Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albright: Panthers circling on Pickett


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Verge said:

This was my last prediction 

xsPafp.jpg

I had 
Sewell > Horn > Waddle as our options 

vdRFu7.jpg

When Mac dropped I thought they would go him because of the hype he got from a few different people, that was incorrect. 

In retrospect we maybe should have taken Mac.  Good call on Horn and if Sewell was there is was probably the pick

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Verge said:

So people like Igo, me, and Norris say it happened, and then Marty Hurney says it happened, but that is just fake? I guess I am not following the logic. He literally tells you he tried to move up for Greg Little. He would have drafted Greg Little at 16 if Burns was not there. 

I just have to say that's astounding. You actually limped into this with that as a "source". A phrase that's repeated year in and out by scouts, managers, commentators. Every single draft we hear the phrase "first round talent", often a hundred times just from the commentary of the second round.

This is so disgusing that you're trying to argue this as a source. No wonder you're so far off the mark. You're reading tea leaves, and using it as facts.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

In retrospect we maybe should have taken Mac.  Good call on Horn and if Sewell was there is was probably the pick

Don't forget the Waddle prediction.

So it's Mac, then Waddle, then maybe Horn (like all the rest of the media was idicating for weeks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I just have to say that's astounding. You actually limped into this with that as a "source". A phrase that's repeated year in and out by scouts, managers, commentators. Every single draft we hear the phrase "first round talent", often a hudren times just from the commentary of the second round.

This is so disgustly that your'e trying to argue this as a source. No wonder you're so far off the mark. You're reading tea leaves, and using it as facts.

Ok dude whatever you say.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

On a side note, we heard from Rhule about why he didnt take slater but I would love to know how in the holy fug they fuged up the Parsons evaluation that badly?   Lack of tape?

It baffles me that Panthers fans suddenly want to spend more 1st round picks on LBs. We probably have the strongest history at 4-3 LBs of any team in the league since our inception and that's paved the way to an overall losing record and investing far too many resources into lower value positions is a big reason why.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It baffles me that Panthers fans suddenly want to spend more 1st round picks on LBs. We probably have the strongest history at 4-3 LBs of any team in the league since our inception and that's paved the way to an overall losing record and investing far too many resources into lower value positions is a big reason why.

I would go Slater-Parsons-Horn in the last draft (assuming we had ruled out a qb)

 

I dont prefer MLB over tackles but that dude is special.  I would be damn sure happier now knowing we had Parsons on the roster instead of Horn.  But thats just me

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the coach and staff that is overly obsessed with metrics and a few inches or pounds...is going to completely ignore one of the biggest and most important metrics in football?

If we take Pickett, they should announce the pick and announce the firing of Rhule at the same time.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I would go Slater-Parsons-Horn in the last draft (assuming we had ruled out a qb)

 

I dont prefer MLB over tackles but that dude is special.  I would be damn sure happier now knowing we had Parsons on the roster instead of Horn.  But thats just me

I can't complain too much about Horn. He looked legit before the injury and CB >>>>> off ball LB all day everyday. It's just that pick absolutely should've been between Fields and Slater IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Krovvy said:

Okay, so the trade would amount to trading up half of the second round. That is, if the rumor is accurate.

Some would say that's an okay gamble for a team without a quarterback. Especially considering most of this fanbase was okay with trading a second, fourth, and sixth for Darnold, and then argued it's fine we're taking his fifth year option.

So, the rumor of Hurney trying to trade next year's first to move back into the first in 2010 has been debunked. I know it's a huddle favorite, but it never made sense, and never had any sourced backing.

Aaahhh, no.

You suggested we didn't attempt to trade with anyone. That was proven wrong.

Then you said, "oh the rumor was that we tried to trade back into the first round". No it wasn't.

The story  was that we attempted to trade up to get Clausen, which we did. And unlike your characterization of it being just a few spots, it would have been a pretty significant jump.

As to whether people suggested we tried to trade next year's first rounder? Nobody knows for certain what was offered other than that the Rams asked for more than we were willing to give up.

Could it have included next year's first? Given that Marty had already done that twice, yes it's possible.

I get that you're trying to spend this so that you can still say you were right.

You weren't, and youve neither proven nor "debunked" anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

So the coach and staff that is overly obsessed with metrics and a few inches or pounds...is going to completely ignore one of the biggest and most important metrics in football?

If we take Pickett, they should announce the pick and announce the firing of Rhule at the same time.

Rhule will say whatever to fit his agenda. He should not be an nfl coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

I'm still waiting for a source on that too.

You guys will be blaming Hurney a decade from now. Meanwhile we're in a death spiral as a franchise.

Hurney flat out told reporters that he was considering a move up into round 1 to take Greg Little.  I distinctly remember that

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Hurney flat out told reporters that he was considering a move up into round 1 to take Greg Little.

You remember correctly.

As it turns out, Hurney and the Panthers were trying to move up to get Little much earlier in the draft. Speaking in an interview with Sirius XM NFL Radio, Hurney talked about Little. He says they were trying to trade up to get him as early as the No. 21 overall pick in the first round. 

USA Today Panthers Wire

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...