Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How far would the Stafford led Panthers have gone?


 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Stafford is better than average, but he's still a bum.

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, saX man said:

If we were shunned by FAs last year (including Stafford), we’ll be like canvassers getting the door slammed on them this offseason seeking decent free agents. 

We are twirling down the porcelain passageway folks.

Yep, going to be even harder to get quality FAs this year. Bottom feeders we are.....yet again. Yay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Thats my point.  He is above average and was on a ridiculous team.  My idea of franchise QBs are guys that elevate everyone around them and make their team better and can carry them to victory if no one else can.  Stafford isn't that.  He needs the guys around him to do a lot of the carrying. 

He's better than average, but he isn't what people have tried to make him out to be.  He almost blew that game had the officials not stepped in late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...