Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How far would the Stafford led Panthers have gone?


 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

We would have made the playoffs I think 9-8. There were 3 to 4 games where we had good qb play we would have been ok.


Eagles not having Darius Slay be the best receiver.

Vikings that opening drive

NE the pick 6 

New Orleans part 2 

just to name a few.

If Stafford could stay healthy, I agree. 8-9 wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Stafford is better than average, but he's still a bum.

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, saX man said:

If we were shunned by FAs last year (including Stafford), we’ll be like canvassers getting the door slammed on them this offseason seeking decent free agents. 

We are twirling down the porcelain passageway folks.

Yep, going to be even harder to get quality FAs this year. Bottom feeders we are.....yet again. Yay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

Incorrect, he proved a lot of people wrong who believed he was the problem in Detroit.

 But just as in Detroit he wouldnt be good enough to carry a  a bad team and even worse coaching staff if he were here. 

Thats my point.  He is above average and was on a ridiculous team.  My idea of franchise QBs are guys that elevate everyone around them and make their team better and can carry them to victory if no one else can.  Stafford isn't that.  He needs the guys around him to do a lot of the carrying. 

He's better than average, but he isn't what people have tried to make him out to be.  He almost blew that game had the officials not stepped in late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...