Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we draft a QB, I want Carson Strong


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

Cams running ability hindered his early development as a NFL QB. You see him now actually go through all his reads 4-5 at times before reacting.

Carson is relying on his arm to make his plays from the beginning. He's coming back from the knee so I'm sure his mobility will increase as time goes forward.

Maybe high risk at 6, but a MUCH MUCH MUCH better pick at 6 than old Pickett. Younger, more upside, height, arm etc.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Dude, everything I've pretty much read says that he is an AVERAGE athlete. In today's NFL, that's not going to cut it. He's virtually a statue. I would like someone who, when the script breaks down, can ad lib and make things happen off schedule. 

His knee is a HUGE question mark that I don't want to have to deal with on any given Sunday. It could start swelling again, and then what? No thanks!

I like how you are trying to intimate that Corral will only be successful in an RPO-based offense. Like any QB coming out of college, Corral will need to grow and develop. He can do what Strong can and so much more. Plus, he's more accurate.

 

Corral is my number 2. I posted about it in the draft forum. I think he needs a year to sit. I think Strong can come in and start day 1.

Also, you can be a success in the NFL as a pocket passer, even today. Just because you aren't out there running RPOs and rushing for 1k yards doesn't mean your immobile. Strong has great mobility within the pocket, which is far more valuable than running ability. He has a better pocket presence than Kenny Pickett who is considered a better athlete, and as such, bails on more clean pockets than any prospect in the draft this year. 

But yeah, I like strong number one for future NFL success in the NFL. If Corral gets a chance to sit and learn, I like him too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that I'm a fan of taking Pickett at six, but to be fair, didn't people use the "one year wonder" criticism on Joe Burrow too?

As to Strong, I don't really give a sh-t about a quarterback's athleticism if they can make the reads and get the ball out fast.

I swear it's like people never watched Tom Brady, Peyton Manning or Drew Brees play (or didn't pay attention to just how long their careers lasted).

Strong has issues just like everyone else. And, his issues certainly won't overcome a bad line--maybe even not an average line.

From PFN:

Young quarterbacks always have flaws, and Strong is no different. He’s farther along than his age would suggest, but he’s also not a finished product. Most notably, pressure can create trouble for Strong. The Nevada QB can plant his feet prematurely at times and make himself vulnerable. He also tries to force the ball under pressure occasionally, leading to volatility and inaccuracy. He doesn’t always detect pressure on the backside, and creating for himself isn’t a natural strength.

Furthermore, Strong sometimes fades away as he throws, limiting downfield distance. He can be easily forced backward by blitzing players, and he tends to fade back on rollouts at times, limiting his leverage as a thrower. Strong isn’t afraid to take risks even in high-pressure situations, but he can sometimes lead the ball into dangerous areas.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/carson-strong-nevada-qb-nfl-draft-scouting-report-2022/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 89 said:

He's only a viable option in a trade-back scenario. At pick 6, that's a negative.

I agree. I would prefer to trade back, acquire more picks, then take him mid first. Dream scenario is one of the top edge guys falls to us so Philly sends us two of their first rounders to get him. Take strong and an OL with those two picks, then chill for day 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Strong has issues just like everyone else. And, his issues certainly won't overcome a bad line--maybe even not an average line.

From PFN:

Young quarterbacks always have flaws, and Strong is no different. He’s farther along than his age would suggest, but he’s also not a finished product. Most notably, pressure can create trouble for Strong. The Nevada QB can plant his feet prematurely at times and make himself vulnerable. He also tries to force the ball under pressure occasionally, leading to volatility and inaccuracy. He doesn’t always detect pressure on the backside, and creating for himself isn’t a natural strength.

Furthermore, Strong sometimes fades away as he throws, limiting downfield distance. He can be easily forced backward by blitzing players, and he tends to fade back on rollouts at times, limiting his leverage as a thrower. Strong isn’t afraid to take risks even in high-pressure situations, but he can sometimes lead the ball into dangerous areas.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/carson-strong-nevada-qb-nfl-draft-scouting-report-2022/

All prospects do. In that same article, it talks about his strengths as a pocket passer:

Quote

What are the requisite traits for a pocket passer? Predictably, working well in the pocket is at the top of the list. To do that, you need to be poised. You have to navigate the pocket, manipulate space, and navigate passing lanes. High-level processing is preferred (as is high-level arm strength) to capitalize on windows as they appear. Strong has all of these traits.

The Nevada QB has a great arm along with natural mechanics, accuracy, pocket navigation ability, eye discipline, and anticipation. In structure, he has the processing ability and decisiveness to make the most of his system. He also has enough mobility to manipulate the pocket, stay on his feet, and perform some limited work off-platform.

Strong can still work on seeing the field a bit better and cutting down bad risks. NFL safeties may exploit his tendency to stare down targets downfield at times in his early years. Nevertheless, while he can be more consistent reading the field and manipulating defenders, Strong has shown the necessary processing capacity in flashes. Combine that with his natural pocket maneuverability and rocket arm, and he can be a long-term starter with good protection.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, I'm watching that video and I'm thinking I really wouldn't mind us spending a day 2 pick on Cole Turner. Apparently not a great route runner, but I wouldn't mind having a target that big in the end zone. Between the size mismatch and his ability to go up and make catches with his hands, not many defender could stop him. Could definitely help our red zone woes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

All prospects do. In that same article, it talks about his strengths as a pocket passer:

 

He looks to be a great clean pocket passer, and he damned well better be with one good knee.

LOL. I appreciate you, Ricky, but remember, you asked us to prove how wrong you are. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want Ridder. He has question marks for sure but I like his mobility and the fact that he’s been in a leadership role on a winning team for some sustained period of time. 
 

My ideal scenario is trading into the teens and picking up a second. Drafting Linderbaum or hopefully one of the tackles falls, and then Ridder in the 2nd. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

I want Ridder. He has question marks for sure but I like his mobility and the fact that he’s been in a leadership role on a winning team for some sustained period of time. 
 

My ideal scenario is trading into the teens and picking up a second. Drafting Linderbaum or hopefully one of the tackles falls, and then Ridder in the 2nd. 

The top 3 Tackles could easily be gone by pick 5 in this draft. It's all over the place prediction wise. I dunno if that would be a good or bad thing for our trade back options

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

Dude, everything I've pretty much read says that he is an AVERAGE athlete. 

 

Personally, I prefer someone who can get the ball out quick and accurate over someone who can run around and buy time scrambling. IMO, that is what separates great qb's from decent to good.  Of course, a qb who can do both would be even better.    

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...