Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The veteran quarterback market...


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If Watson is the only even remotely elite QB on the market, yeah his market is going to go up for sure. If he can get his legal issues resolved Houston can likely get their rumored asking price from someone.

From what I've read, the latest judge's ruling may have complicated things a little as the order of the depositions will apparently allow the DA to use testimony Watson must give under oath toward criminal charges.

Word as far as team interest seems to be that the lawsuits may not scare teams right now but the potential criminal proceedings might.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncstatekwi said:

Ride with SAMMY...build the line....look for QB in 2023!

If awful is the only option I'd rather just roll with PJ Walker. Get whatever you can for Sam or cut him. He is that bad and I don't think the locker room would survive 17 more games of him starting.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather see Mariota than Trubisky.  I think Trubisky is the better player, but Mariota has legs and around here that's gonna be important.  Anyone who thinks we're going to fix our line this offseason is in for a rude September.

That's assuming we figure out how to sign a roster with so little money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Saw a mock showing us trading up to 3 and taking the qb out of Liberty…

Tell me why I think this is a very good possibility.

We don't have enough picks as it is. We're definitely in no position to trade up.

And no way in hell would I trade up for Willis...or any other quarterback in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Please no.

 

12 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

 

He can not trade for Jimmy "Im in the best QB spot in the world and yield "meh" results " G. Im already close to the edge, I swear that will be it for me and i would feel like a clown about supporting 3rd year Rhule.  

That would give Rhule 0-4 in huge QB decisions, Jimmy G is not the answer. 

Much rather trade for Trey lance, even with the bad press he is getting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

He can not trade for Jimmy "Im in the best QB spot in the world and yield "meh" results " G. Im already close to the edge, I swear that will be it for me and i would feel like a clown about supporting 3rd year Rhule.  

That would give Rhule 0-4 in huge QB decisions, Jimmy G is not the answer. 

Much rather trade for Trey lance, even with the bad press he is getting....

We might as well get ready for it, it’s been mentioned the most is Jimmy Porn Star G coming to Carolina! Also I didn’t know Lance was getting bad press why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...