Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilson to the Broncos


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I know that's what a lot of hopeful Panther fans are wanting to happen, but I don't think it's quite that likely.

The term is "a quarterback away".

If you have to add something else to the equation, we're not a quarterback away.

Throwing that "offensive line" is not one position, it's several.

What makes everybody so sure that the Broncos are just "a QB away"?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Hence Tank for Trevor. If we say trade for Watson we will have spent $190M, three 1sts, probably two 2nds, a 4th and a 6th looking for Cam’s replacement through 2025 while Jax used one 1st and spent $60M.

Thats for sure.  If only we had the 6th pick next year instead of this year.  Hell, the way things are going though we will probably have a top 3 pick next year, when there is a much better crop of college QBs set to come out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chad_Cota said:

What do you think Watson's trade Value is: 

CMC

6th ovr this year, next years first, and 2nd? 

I know Houston wants a haul but right now I wouldn't even give a 1st for Watson. There's no guarantee he ever plays another down in the NFL. All the civil suits plus criminal complaints make his future anything but certain. 

It's also not far fetched that if Houston wants to get serious about building a competitive team and Watson doesn't get traded, he may be cut for cap room at the end of next season if his legal matters aren't resolved. Not to mention how many fans, especially female, are going to feel knowing that we don't care about whether or not you may be a sexual predator as long as you can throw a football. 

We should stay the hell from Watson until all of this is sorted out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Hence Tank for Trevor. If we say trade for Watson we will have spent $190M, three 1sts, probably two 2nds, a 4th and a 6th looking for Cam’s replacement through 2025 while Jax used one 1st and spent $60M.

Yeah don’t want Watson. I would just feel weird cheering for him at this point as well. I’d rather gamble on a rookie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among the players we know reportedly heading to Seattle: backup QB Drew Lock.

According to Pelissero, he was informed Tuesday afternoon that he was part of the Wilson trade, as was defensive end Shelby Harris and tight end Noah Fant.

As far as the draft picks, quite a few are reportedly headed to Seattle: Two first-round picks, two second-round picks, and a fifth-round pick, while a fourth-round pick is headed to Denver with Wilson.

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BlueDaBaDee said:

It was the Seahawks 38th season in the NFL when Wilson beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl. Now on 3/8 he is traded to the 38th state exactly 38 weeks before his birthday. Wild.

Gee....I wonder who this is?

Bye again, you little weirdo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Gee....I wonder who this is?

Bye again, you little weirdo.

It was the Seahawks 38th season in the NFL when Wilson beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl. Now on 3/8 he is traded to the 38th state exactly 38 weeks before his birthday. Wild.

 

Nothing about this is ban worthy nor anything I've posted prior. Let me post my thoughts. Thought police. WTF Rayzor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlueDab said:

It was the Seahawks 38th season in the NFL when Wilson beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl. Now on 3/8 he is traded to the 38th state exactly 38 weeks before his birthday. Wild.

Nothing about this is ban worthy nor anything I've posted prior. Let me post my thoughts. Thought police. WTF Rayzor.

Nobody's interested in this bullsh-t, dude.

Give it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlueDab said:

It was the Seahawks 38th season in the NFL when Wilson beat the Broncos in the Super Bowl. Now on 3/8 he is traded to the 38th state exactly 38 weeks before his birthday. Wild.

 

Nothing about this is ban worthy nor anything I've posted prior. Let me post my thoughts. Thought police. WTF Rayzor.

Lol not like I haven't banned you about 30 times already. I know who you are. Stay gone and I won't ban you anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...