Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers scouts high on Malik Willis


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ImaginaryKev said:

Plus next year has three legit prospects who'd have been picked ahead of anyone this year (Young, Stroud, Jurkovec) and this team isn't a QB away from being good. 

This time last year everyone had Sam Howell pegged as #1 pick this year

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ImaginaryKev said:

Plus next year has three legit prospects who'd have been picked ahead of anyone this year (Young, Stroud, Jurkovec) and this team isn't a QB away from being good. 

Don’t sleep on Haener, Slovis or Levis as well. I love me some Haener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely wishful thinking to not only already be hyping a QB class next year nobody knows will pan out and just assuming we will have a top pick. That "next year" mantra has been ongoing and is getting stale. Not only that for some reason people seem to be under an illusion that we will draft one hit and be done. If you think it works that way for every team you're in for a very rude awakening.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2022 at 8:11 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Was he third string?

Jarrett Stidham is definitely no The Golden Calf of Bristol. He wasn't even a Fromm. Bo Nix was trash and that's the guy who ultimately made Willis transfer. Willis couldn't beat out Bo Nix.

Joe Burrow was third string at OSU and had to transfer because he had no shot at playing. Joe Burrow was this close to winning a super bowl and JT Barrett and Haskins are bums.

So is Joe Burrow a worse QB than the two he couldn't beat out at OSU...or no?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They had Howell and Rattler as the top 2 picks. His point was a long cab change in a year. 

Sure but the volume of potential top guys is much more vast then this season.  There are some studs that are going to be coming out

 

Hell I think Stroud would be the #1 overall qb this season if he was in teh mix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Sure but the volume of potential top guys is much more vast then this season.  There are some studs that are going to be coming out

 

Hell I think Stroud would be the #1 overall qb this season if he was in teh mix

The big two are Stroud/Young, the others are high potential guys but still have something to prove. People are also going to question Stroud being from OSU’s system (I think it’s a dumb argument) and Young have a loaded team and being undersized. 
If it was 2020 Howell this year, he would be the top pick. Banking on next year is still not full proof because we don’t know what will happen over the college season and we don’t know where we will be picking/who will be ahead of us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People already had questions on for Howell due to the offense he plays in and the fact that he was losing his skill guys to the nfl. He still played well but all the questions about him remained and I think people around here liked him more than the consensus bc he's local. 

Rattler was the hyped up arm talent prospect but of course he bombed and got benched.

The prospects next year are much more well regarded, that doesn't mean things can't change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ImaginaryKev said:

People already had questions on for Howell due to the offense he plays in and the fact that he was losing his skill guys to the nfl. He still played well but all the questions about him remained and I think people around here liked him more than the consensus bc he's local. 

Rattler was the hyped up arm talent prospect but of course he bombed and got benched.

The prospects next year are much more well regarded, that doesn't mean things can't change. 

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/amp/nfl/news/nfl-draft-2022-quarterbacks-sam-howell-spencer-rattler/sc4whw5b2o1r14yqbcdbajdiw
 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2022-nfl-draft-sam-howell-spencer-rattler-among-five-prospects-to-watch-at-each-position/amp/
 

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/2022-qb-class-is-sam-howell-spencer-rattler-or-kedon-slovis-the-top-quarterback-prospect/
 

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10010623-spencer-rattler-sam-howell-headline-todd-mcshays-top-50-2022-nfl-draft-prospects.amp.html
 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

It's definitely wishful thinking to not only already be hyping a QB class next year nobody knows will pan out and just assuming we will have a top pick. That "next year" mantra has been ongoing and is getting stale. Not only that for some reason people seem to be under an illusion that we will draft one hit and be done. If you think it works that way for every team you're in for a very rude awakening.

#TankForTrevor

#TankForHowell

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...