Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Incoming LT?


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Can you Imagine:

O Line: Big free agent LT, Christensen, Elf, Austin Corbett, Moton.

QB: Deshaun Watson

WR: DJ Moore, Anderson, Marshall JR 

Running back: CMC, Hubbard

TE: Tremble, Ian Thomas 

👀👀👀

 

If Rhule were to fug that up, we'd at least know we'd be one of the most attractive landing places in the entire league

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are talking about OT free agents in this draft, it could mean one of two things:

1. We are trading our #6 overall pick for Watson.

2. We are using our #6 overall pick on a QB, probably Willis. 

It makes more sense to sign a free agent LT if you signed Watson than it does to pass on a solid LT for a mediocre QB likely to bust.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

If we sign Armstead, the Aints would be wise to sign Greg Hardy now that he's out of the UFC. Dude literally racked up like 5 sacks in 2013 against Armstead...

Did hardy get cut? Goes to show it takes more than athleticism to be a pro fighter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Just trying to figure out how we shell out the money for a top Guard, big money on LT, and huge on QB...  If we can ditch Darnold's cap hit then it makes sense.  Man that was a dumb move extending him...

I read somewhere if he’s traded we carry 0 dead money and none of his salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Really big assumption Houston is taking back Darnold.  More like wishful thinking

I think its a fair assumption based on everything we have seen from reports around the trade scenario. Also, with Verge's tweet just now, something big is imminent for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...