Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Watson Thread - Part Deux


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ncstatekwi said:

I find it interesting there is very very little to no coverage of Deshaun Watson on ESPN or NFL.COM.  I wonder if they are making a statement here.  There is definitely a lot of TB12 TB12 TB12....hmmmmm.....

They definitely are...  I said the same thing yesterday.  When we have been the frontrunner, the national media dies down to a whisper.  When another team seemed to be getting in the driver's seat, they were frothing at the mouth to tweet, retweet, and report.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

They definitely are...  I said the same thing yesterday.  When we have been the frontrunner, the national media dies down to a whisper.  When another team seemed to be getting in the driver's seat, they were frothing at the mouth to tweet, retweet, and report.

Very Very Very interesting....hmm...I have a lot of theories....but it is extremely odd...even on ESPN and FS1 yesterday...its either all about how the LAKERS stink poo or TB12....whispers about WATSON...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

There’s no way he’s going to the Browns. He could play in Charlotte or NO but chooses Cleveland? Nah. His agent is forcing that meeting because he owes the GM or something…

...Actually, If he wants to win, CLE is the spot with all the supporting cast. They only need a qb to make a push to get to the next level.  If he wants to wallow in sht for four years come here or go to NO....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncguy2184 said:

Anything panthers related and it's a ghost town on all the major networks it's always been this way. 

EXCEPT when we make the Superbowl they have to kinda talk about us for a week. 

 

Not if there is something negative to report. We took over every media outlet when Hardy had his scandal. Round the clock Panthers coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Not if there is something negative to report. We took over every media outlet when Hardy had his scandal. Round the clock Panthers coverage.

Yeah true, also when cam would do the post game interviews when we lost and he would kinda pout because he wasn't acting happy enough for ESPN after a loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncguy2184 said:

Yeah true, also when cam would do the post game interviews when we lost and he would kinda pout because he wasn't acting happy enough for ESPN after a loss.

And if we do too well all the sports media outlets will repeat the same line "worst 12-0, 13-0 ect team of all time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I do want us to get Watson because I believe you need a QB in today's NFL to win, BUT only thing is if we do happen to get Watson does that mean no matter how this up coming season goes we will have another year after this one of Matt Rhule? Say Watson misses 6 games and we miss the playoffs will Tepper give Rhule one more prove it year? 

 

I really want us to get Watson BAD! I think he is a top 4 QB but Matt Rhule is #32 Head Coach and needs to be shown the door he should have been fired before the end of the season last year.

 

Matt Rhule is PURE GARBAGE and I'm scared that he may be the reason we don't get Watson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...