Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love


Biggdaddi1022
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

Yeah he would. No one is trading significant assets for a player on the last year of his deal unless they can agree to terms on an extension. If Lamar isn't willing to negotiate an extension, trade dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It would happen this year most likely, especially if the ravens are unable to extend him. It’s too risky going into the off-season , they could Franchise tag him, but he would be cheaper for competing teams to acquire him. They would only have to give up 2 1sts at max if was franchise tagged.

 

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

I would trade 6 and next years first in a second for him if he extends his contract with us.  He isn’t perfect but I wouldn’t miss a snap watching this team with that dude.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It blowsy mind folks can't see this. Classic example of the reality that QBs usually get more credit than they deserve when the team is doing well and more blame than they deserve when the team isn't doing well. Jimmy G is and was trash carried by a good team.

Foles... nah, he isn't good but that dude did capture lightning in a bottle during that run. He was a big reason why they won the SB. In the NFC CG and SB he threw for a combined 700+ yards and 6 TDs vs. only 1 INT whole completing roughly 70% of his attempts. That's ELITE play if only for a very brief yet pivotal period.

What I meant by that statement was because of that game teams looked at Foles differently and thought he was a franchise QB suddenly despite being a back up for years and, like you said, caught lightning in a bottle. 

His regression started the year after, he wasn’t nearly as good the season after the Super Bowl as he was during that magical stretch. Then he was given a big contract by the Jags and he got injured, came back and played very poorly

Yes, he was amazing during that Super Bowl run, but teams saw a Super Bowl and thought he turned a corner and was now an elite QB. Instead of looking at the perfect situation Foles was in. 

 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He fuging sucks, and at that price, did we not learn our lesson with Teddy or Darnold?  My God.  Just please stop.  Spend those picks on a mid-round rookie in the draft and you're still probably going to end up with a better player than Teddy, Darnold, or Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

It would happen this year most likely, especially if the ravens are unable to extend him. It’s too risky going into the off-season , they could Franchise tag him, but he would be cheaper for competing teams to acquire him. They would only have to give up 2 1sts at max if was franchise tagged.

 

if it’s a trade he wouldn’t have a choice, bc it’s still his rookie contract. 

Fitty…

Make It So Star Trek GIF
 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had everything saved on an old email address and my computer crashed and could not be revived.  I tried reviving it, then stumbled on one I was going to create several years ago...So I am using it instead.  My fault--did not keep the email and forgot password--
    • Rasheed Walker for Kris Jenkins Jr.is what i am actually referring to in that particular post  all those #'s you are referring to are athletic #'s & Monroe Freeling had or has an impressive combination of size & raw athletiscm & it has nothing do with his size or athelticsm that is preventing him from being a day 1 starter in the NFL technique is where he struggled at the NFL combine & not only scouts but analysts alike also viewed him as more of a developmental type of player rather than a day 1 starter  go take a look at Will Campbell transition from the SEC to the NFL another first round LT that was drafted #4 overall by the New England Patriot,s.Will Campbell was a three year starter at  LSU & was thought to be one of if not the very best LT's in the SEC  & compare his SEC carrer to his rookie season in the NFL? just because you played good in the SEC at LT does nescarrily mean you are ready to start at LT in the NFL day 1 & or your rookie season  & one last thing i think you are jumping to conclusion & somehow assuming that i do not like Monroe Freeling ?which could not be further from the truth .what i do not like is the idea starting a player who is not ready ...just saying 
    • I'd 10x rather play the NFC North than NFC West. 
×
×
  • Create New...