Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Replacing Reddick


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know our staff has said they see Luvu as a starter-quality edge guy, and while I appreciate his potential, I also think it is fairly important to bring in a proven guy just to cover all of our bases.

I'm thinking Clowney or Zadarius Smith.  Both guys can play all 3 downs, will provide pass rush but will also be more stout against the run than what we had last season. 

I wonder why we haven't heard any whispers about this position of need?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on signings like Wilson, and Littleton, I think we see a trend back towards more DE's as the edges in our fronts versus an EDGE LB'er. 

With that in mind YGM is the immediate beneficiary, and in Nickel fronts / pass downs -- Haynes / Luvu will spell. I think we continue to see hybrid fronts. 

I am also not against adding -- Clowney / Ingram / Hughes as veterans to add to the rotation.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SetfreexX said:

Based on signings like Wilson, and Littleton, I think we see a trend back towards more DE's as the edges in our fronts versus an EDGE LB'er. 

With that in mind YGM is the immediate beneficiary, and in Nickel fronts / pass downs -- Haynes / Luvu will spell. I think we continue to see hybrid fronts. 

I am also not against adding -- Clowney / Ingram / Hughes as veterans to add to the rotation.

Would love to see them get Ingram

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we may feel that we have it covered with Luvu and Haynes.  Both were on the brink of breaking out--both simply needed more time on the field.  Their production vs. the number of snaps they played was impressive--I see the point, but I think we might lose a sack or two, but we might not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I think we may feel that we have it covered with Luvu and Haynes.  Both were on the brink of breaking out--both simply needed more time on the field.  Their production vs. the number of snaps they played was impressive--I see the point, but I think we might lose a sack or two, but we might not.

Burns has to start converting on more of his near misses, too. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

There hasn’t been a more overrated football player the past two decades than Jadaveon Clowney. He was a decent college player but was very big beneficiary of the social media boom and making some highlights on ESPN. 

Lazy.  His work ethic is (reportedly) non-existent.  He has always gotten by on his natural ability--which is impressive.  For example:

https://www.fieldgulls.com/2020/4/17/21224921/work-ethic-concerns-trailed-seattle-seahawks-jadeveon-clowney-since-being-drafted-texans-free-agent

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

There hasn’t been a more overrated football player the past two decades than Jadaveon Clowney. He was a decent college player but was very big beneficiary of the social media boom and making some highlights on ESPN. 

Some players make their name on one highlight.

spacer.png

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reddick played out of his mind last year and was a key reason the D started out so strong.   We should have signed a 2 year on that one, but oh well.   I don't think Haynes or Luvu have the abiltiy to do as well as Reddick did.  I would be very happy if we put some capital there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...