Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers have first round grades on 3 QBs.


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Willis is my favorite QB in this draft, but IF we could trade back and still get Corral that has to be a huge win. How exiting would Corral and CMC be in our backfield. That quick release can get him the ball in a blink of an eye or he can play action strike it right to Moore! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zod said:

“Those in the Panthers organization view Malik Willis, Kenny Pickett and Matt Corral as the top quarterbacks in this draft class, worthy of first-round picks" 

 

From the observer. 

 

Expect a trade back and a selection of one of these guys.

I wonder if this will change tomorrow after Sam Howell's Pro Day.  Last year, had he been eligible, he would have been rated behind Lawrence and Wilson.

I think he's as good as any of these QBs in this thread.  They all have question marks.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Won't happen. He doesn't like Cam, I don't think. Too big of a voice. Not a sheep like Rhule prefers.

Yeah plus Cam wasn’t HIS guy. Cam was a Panther long before Rhule was and Rhule seems a little narcissistic and wants to be the guy who found/developed our next QB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Verge said:

Who is trading up with us? Who are they trading up for? 

I got a few, points line up

Philly- Sauce(hell I would do that and I never cared for CBs, 2 late first and get a long quick CB, f yea)

Minn - choice DE (their 1st and 2nd) 

Sea - Wilis (they may feel hes wilson 2.0 got plenty of draft capital)

Wild cards - Jets- LT/DE/C/WR (done deals before and they hold the 10, may want to jump the comp and have plenty of picks......many due to panthers ugh....)

Pitt - QB/willis ( the cost would be too much and they never seem to pull off these types of moves.....but theres always a first and if Willis falls some they could be up for it)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Willis is my favorite QB in this draft, but IF we could trade back and still get Corral that has to be a huge win. How exiting would Corral and CMC be in our backfield. That quick release can get him the ball in a blink of an eye or he can play action strike it right to Moore! 

Almost 6'2", hand size 9 5/8.  Great at the RPO.  I think he might have as much upside as Willis, if all factors are considered.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I wonder if this will change tomorrow after Sam Howell's Pro Day.  Last year, had he been eligible, he would have been rated behind Lawrence and Wilson.

I think he's as good as any of these QBs in this thread.  They all have question marks.

 

Rattler and Howell were seen as consensus top QBs this time last year.

Goes to show what looking too far ahead, draft wise gets you.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Almost 6'2", hand size 9 5/8.  Great at the RPO.  I think he might have as much upside as Willis, if all factors are considered.

And he had that Ole Miss team super competitive against top competition. I remember when they came to Knoxville (where I live) and were missing several starters on offense, Kiffin (who UT hates) just responded with “We have Corral we’ll be ok.” Also if we are looking for a new coach next year we can bring on Kiffin to further develop him! (Kidding, kind of…)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think 6 is way too high for him.  position inflation (as with QB)

Penning is getting drafted ahead of him. Cross and Thib are gonna slip.

Penning ahead of Cross

Jermain Johnson Jr and Walker ahead of Thibodaux

Garrett Wilson is also going high. Possibly top-7

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, La Pantera said:

Rattler and Howell were seen as consensus top QBs this time last year.

Goes to show what looking too far ahead, draft wise gets you.

Yeah I’ve mentioned this to the “next year’s class” crew, but it seems to fall on deaf ears…

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

Penning is getting drafted ahead of him. Cross and Thib are gonna slip.

Penning ahead of Cross

Jermain Johnson Jr and Walker ahead of Thibodaux

Garrett Wilson is also going high. Possibly top-7

 

To make you feel much worse about your thinking here, I am on the exact same page.  I have Wilson to Atlanta at 8, however, so you have that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

And he had that Ole Miss team super competitive against top competition. I remember when they came to Knoxville (where I live) and were missing several starters on offense, Kiffin (who UT hates) just responded with “We have Corral we’ll be ok.” Also if we are looking for a new coach next year we can bring on Kiffin to further develop him! (Kidding, kind of…)

No SR Bowl, no combine--he is flying under the radar. 

Now I am going to dazzle with some conspiracy theory--the Panthers were all over Pickett--front and center for Willis at their pro days--but the presence at Corral's day seemed less of an event--I have to go back and check details, but I think McAdoo or someone like that (Mr Scot--I need you here) was absent and they did less in front of cameras to show interest. 

I just gotta feeling....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

Rattler and Howell were seen as consensus top QBs this time last year.

Goes to show what looking too far ahead, draft wise gets you.

What makes it interesting to me is that a QB like Pickett has a good year and he's like the cream of the crop.

Sam had an incredible season last year. 30 TD to 7 picks 2021 he was 24 TD to 9 picks in 2021.  Mirror attempts but 20 less receptions from a much less talented offense.  He had elite WRs and RBs in 2020 and nothing close in 2021 yet only missed duplicating 2020 by 500 yards (41 yds per game).

His career completion average 63.8% completion.

My point is that he should be in the same conversation as these other guys.  All have huge risk written on them and Sam has as many positive marks as they other 3.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...