Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

big Saints / Eagles trade


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not reading this entire thread but I felt that my voice needs to be heard--even if it is repetitive.

Here is what we know:
The Giants have announced they want to trade #5.

The Saints went after Watson and still want a QB, even though they added Dalton to play behind Crablegs.

The Saints and Giants have probably worked out a deal to trade on draft day if a certain player is available.

The Saints know that the Panthers (6), Falcons (8), and Seahawks (9) are in the market. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am not reading this entire thread but I felt that my voice needs to be heard--even if it is repetitive.

Here is what we know:
The Giants have announced they want to trade #5.

The Saints went after Watson and still want a QB, even though they added Dalton to play behind Crablegs.

The Saints and Giants have probably worked out a deal to trade on draft day if a certain player is available.

The Saints know that the Panthers (6), Falcons (8), and Seahawks (9) are in the market. 

 

It's a lot of moving parts but it's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's a lot of moving parts but it's possible.

And if you do the math--what it cost to get the additional first rounder--then what it will cost to move up---that is a hefty price for Willis or Pickett.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Dare i say. Would the panthers consider trading with saints to get those 2 first round picks?? Lol 

If the Giants don't deal or the Panthers offer a better deal, they could to leapfrog not only Carolina, but Atlanta and Seattle as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I am not reading this entire thread but I felt that my voice needs to be heard--even if it is repetitive.

Here is what we know:
The Giants have announced they want to trade #5.

The Saints went after Watson and still want a QB, even though they added Dalton to play behind Crablegs.

The Saints and Giants have probably worked out a deal to trade on draft day if a certain player is available.

The Saints know that the Panthers (6), Falcons (8), and Seahawks (9) are in the market. 

 

seems as logical as anything.

What are the other options?

Moving up for a tackle?  seems expensive 

Some have said they have a big need at tackle and WR.  Maybe they keep both picks and try to fill both and win with Winston?  Seems really risky especially this far out.

Maybe they really like one of the QBs they expect to be there in the mid part of round 1.  This way they have 2 picks, they can draft someone like Howell or Ridder and still draft a WR or OT? Also seems risky this far out.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And if you do the math--what it cost to get the additional first rounder--then what it will cost to move up---that is a hefty price for Willis or Pickett.

 

Depends on how you grade them.

IMO it's a move up for Pickett, he actually has quite a few similarities to Brees.  Accurate, good mechanics, can manipulate the short and intermediate game, etc...

That said, it could be for a Tackle...or they just thing the mid portion of the 1st has a lot of firepower.  Didn't they give up two 1's for Armstead 5 years ago?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

 

IMO it's a move up for Pickett, he actually has quite a few similarities to Brees.  Accurate, good mechanics, can manipulate the short and intermediate game, etc...

 

I had the same thought--I see Pickett as a Saint more than I can see Willis as one--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

I had the same thought--I see Pickett as a Saint more than I can see Willis as one--

Was actually thinking about it last night where I thought each could succeed...neither answer was Carolina.  But I think that Willis could do well in Pittsburgh, and Pickett in New Orleans.

The Saints have been pretty good in the draft for a while now, they have a plan for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Depends on how you grade them.

IMO it's a move up for Pickett, he actually has quite a few similarities to Brees.  Accurate, good mechanics, can manipulate the short and intermediate game, etc...

I agree with you on Pickett. I just hope they aren't intending on stealing him from us. I honestly believe Pickett is going to be great. He has everything he needs to be successful. I've heard he also has the "fire in the belly" like Burrow has. Which I think means he has the Moxy to be a QB in the NFL.

Edited by Panthers Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

I agree with you on Pickett. I just hope they aren't intending on stealing him from us. I honestly believe Pickett is going to be great. He has everything he needs to be successful. I've heard he also has the "fire in the belly" like Burrow has. Which I think means he has the Moxy to be a QB in the NFL.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...