Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers 30-visits tracker


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Panthers have begun a busy week hosting quarterbacks being considered for the upcoming draft. Those scheduled to come to Charlotte are Liberty's Malik Willis, Pittsburgh's Kenny Pickett, Mississippi's Matt Corral, Cincinnati's Desmond Ridder, North Carolina's Sam Howell, Western Kentucky's Bailey Zappe and Nevada's Carson Strong. Two of the first three are considered potential candidates for the No. 6 pick. The team also is hosting the top three tackles this week and next.

- David Newton 

If they don't go qb they better worry about breathing trouble from all the smoke.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Panthers have begun a busy week hosting quarterbacks being considered for the upcoming draft. Those scheduled to come to Charlotte are Liberty's Malik Willis, Pittsburgh's Kenny Pickett, Mississippi's Matt Corral, Cincinnati's Desmond Ridder, North Carolina's Sam Howell, Western Kentucky's Bailey Zappe and Nevada's Carson Strong. Two of the first three are considered potential candidates for the No. 6 pick. The team also is hosting the top three tackles this week and next.

- David Newton 

So Excited Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!  I like to see that we are looking at RBs.  Why?  I'm not sold on Hubbard.  CMC could get hurt at any time and Foreman is likely a one-year rental.  It wouldn't shock me if CMC stays healthy this year that the Panthers may offload him (his contract mainly) before the 2023 season.  Teams need to see he can play an entire season first before any realistic trade.  Without drafting a RB (or another FA) that would leave Hubbard as the #1 entering 2023 given the chips falls that way, which is unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, MrBubba said:

If they don't go qb they better worry about breathing trouble from all the smoke.  

I really think that they would ideally like to trade down to get more picks to make up for the lack of a 2nd or 3rd round pick and take a QB later than 6th.

I just wonder what happens if someone trades up to take a QB in front of them? Would they stick to their guns and still trade back or would they panic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

It sure smells that way.

Agreed. Honestly, taking a RB doesn't make sense otherwise. It would be difficult for a rookie to make the roster with CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard already here and given our lack of draft capital we need to be taking guys who we are very comfortable can make the 53 even with our late rounders.

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Agreed. Honestly, taking a RB doesn't make sense otherwise. It would be difficult for a rookie to make the roster with CMC, Foreman, and Hubbard already here and given our lack of draft capital we need to be taking guys who we are very comfortable can make the 53 even with our late rounders.

 

These RBs could be there with our 4th rounder.  Mid-rounds is where the value is this draft for RBs.  Even if we had our 2nd and 3rd rounder, I wouldn't be for drafting a RB with either of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I assume you are quoting my still. If so, I don't know what your argument is since mine was simply showing a play where Bryce scored a TD against the Rams in the playoffs where another poster used a similar still of Herbert's line to defend his poor performance last night. Like I said, Herbert is a better QB but Bryce wins the game last night for the Chargers. It simply is something he does better than Herbert and would play to his strengths. Someone even said earlier Chargers only win 1 or 2 games this year if Bryce was their QB which is so absurdly laughable it wasn't even worth trying to address. I mean this thread is literally called "Bryce Young is the worst QB in Panther's History" so I understand there is no objective arguments to be had here but I found that amusing. 
    • I think his knee would make a good reason to switch to guard IF he returns.  Half don't.  Half of those don't last too long.  The strain on a knee (320lb man) vs speed rushers is more substantial.  So I would keep him if I could on a small contract (he will make $17.5 in 2026 fully guaranteed) and think of him as a possible guard for the post Lewis/Hunt era.  Knee injuries in big men are not invitations to invest in them.  
    • I'd give anything to go back to a 4-3 but we are so removed from having the pieces for that. All because Tepper wanted to force this 3-4 on all our coaches. 
×
×
  • Create New...