Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is your "model" NFL owner?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, travisura said:

Obviously. I just find it strange that you're so ardently against Deshaun, but so admiring of Robert Kraft. Seems like you wouldn't be, even if the women in the Kraft case gave their consent. 

Unless of course there are other reasons why you like Kraft. He is a billionaire after all. 

Do you really believe the Kraft and Whip-It-Out situations are even remotely similar?

I never stated an opinion on Kraft one way or the other, simply answered the question.  

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna976361
 

Yeah those sex trafficking victims gave consent so all is good, right? You are just walking irony… 

🤦‍♂️
So much hand-wringing and gnashing-of-teeth (not to mention #fakenews) over a 78 year-old single man popping down to the local rub & tug for a pre-game tuneup from a middle-aged Mama-San 🤣 

 


1423F620-D2EE-42CB-92D4-C8565DF841AA.jpeg

11227F13-9BC3-48AE-ADD9-B9BFAA95AED2.jpeg

99A7100B-498D-4321-AC1D-76770B1CDC42.jpeg

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, hepcat said:

well he would still be an NFL owner so probably some people would. 

To answer the question, I don't think there are really any good owners. I think there are only bad ones. A good owner is one who doesn't cause any problems for the team to operate. 

You are probably correct.  But I am just saying that getting Brady and all the SB rings that go with having him made Kraft more well known than most.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/6/2022 at 2:41 PM, Verge said:

I dislike all billionaires tbh. Just want one that is almost completely unattached from all football operations on the field.

So you dislike people because of how much money they have without even knowing the person?  I know 2 that give enormous amounts of money to education programs in areas that badly need it and they are great people that help others every day and create a very large amount of really good paying jobs as well.   I do agree with the part about staying out of football operations.  

Edited by Barney
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

🤦‍♂️
So much hand-wringing and gnashing-of-teeth (not to mention #fakenews) over a 78 year-old single man popping down to the local rub & tug for a pre-game tuneup from a middle-aged Mama-San 🤣 

 


1423F620-D2EE-42CB-92D4-C8565DF841AA.jpeg

11227F13-9BC3-48AE-ADD9-B9BFAA95AED2.jpeg

99A7100B-498D-4321-AC1D-76770B1CDC42.jpeg

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-robert-kraft-sex-trafficking-ring-worked-police-2019-2?amp

https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/2955489002

#FakeNews Deadspin and NY Post!

🤮🤮🧜‍♀️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...