Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer on trading out of the #6 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We have very different definitions of "solid". He was terrible last year.

When you're a former top 10 pick traded a year later for a 3rd you ARE a bust. We're trying to rehab him but year one of rehab resulted in quite the relapse.

Is it his fault he was a top 10 pick?  He. Any help where he was chosen.  He’s a tall and long corner with good speed.  They don’t grow on trees, and certainly can’t be judged by a handful of games.  It’s amazing how people on here give some guys a pass for years, yet are ready to discard a player after a few games and label him a bust.  There are so many nfl players who hit their strides year 3+

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Is it his fault he was a top 10 pick?  He. Any help where he was chosen.  He’s a tall and long corner with good speed.  They don’t grow on trees, and certainly can’t be judged by a handful of games.  It’s amazing how people on here give some guys a pass for years, yet are ready to discard a player after a few games and label him a bust.  There are so many nfl players who hit their strides year 3+

I'll repeat. When you're a top 10 pick and you're traded for much less a year later, you ARE a bust. Josh Rosen is a bust. CJ Henderson is a bust. We hope that we can salvage Henderson's career but early returns don't look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'll repeat. When you're a top 10 pick and you're traded for much less a year later, you ARE a bust. Josh Rosen is a bust. CJ Henderson is a bust. We hope that we can salvage Henderson's career but early returns don't look good.

New coach.  New regime.  Personality issues.  That’s what led to his trade.  Not lack of talent.  
 

anyways - we shall see.  I still think he outplays Jackson l.  And if he doesn’t - he was a 3rd round pick for us.  So our expectations shouldn’t be sky high anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's worked before. Your best bet of landing a legit QB is with a VERY high first round draft pick. So yeah, if #6 overall could get us either a good LT or a spectacularly bad QB, I'll go with option B. We're still a 6-7 win roster with a good LT. That'll be good for a pick in the lower half of the top 10 again. And likely watching those QBs we covet go just out of reach. Again.

 

 

Then when you do run into your 'Franchise' QB you're still looking for a LT.

Weird take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Smithers said:

New coach.  New regime.  Personality issues.  That’s what led to his trade.  Not lack of talent.  
 

anyways - we shall see.  I still think he outplays Jackson l.  And if he doesn’t - he was a 3rd round pick for us.  So our expectations shouldn’t be sky high anyways.

A 3rd and starting te

 

It was a bad trade.  But keep spinning 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

A 3rd and starting te

 

It was a bad trade.  But keep spinning 

Meh - Arnold had more fumbles than he did touchdowns (0) and had a measly 400 yards.  So you consider that starting quality but Henderson is a bust?  Biased any?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2022 at 8:28 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

Adding a top tier LT would complete our transition into the new old Cleveland Browns. We all saw the best LT of his generation suit up for them for a decade while they sucked balls each and every year. 😂

 

At the same time, after drafting Joe Thomas, they spent 3 1st round picks on Qbs over the next 7 years. Those picks: Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Johnny Manziel. So really we'll probably turn ourselves into the old Browns either way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2022 at 9:30 PM, Shocker said:

You are not as smart a person as Matt Rhule

Actually that bar isn't set really high and probably pretty easily crossed by many in here. And that's not a commentary on how brilliant this community is 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO if Ike is there you pull the trigger unless you get one hell of an offer and Neal or Cross might be available still. If Ike is gone and Neal is there then, again, it depends on the offer. If Cross is the one left (other 2 are gone) then Its a real mess- cuz I wouldn't want to miss out on a LT, but he's not really the one  I want. I'm not sold on Penning later either, so this would be a tough decision, but I'd probably trade back. It all depends on who's still available and what is offered. I don't think anyone would just be stuck and not consider the possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All these rankings have more to do with the writers love or hate for a team.  Morgan, IMO, has done a really good job at building this team.  Yeah, there are a couple of whiffs but for the most part he has done quite well drafting and signing free agents.  22 is a bit low but it's a stupid opinion based on how little a writer knows about the Panthers. 
    • When I saw that I was thinking the same thing.  If Evero does have a great season and gets hired as a head coach I wouldn't mind see McD as our DC.  If we do poorly as a team, I definitely would want him to be the front runner for HC.
    • But it's not about not upsetting a player under contract, it's about not causing a rift in the locker room. The players love Bryce, whether as a person or a player doesn't matter.  You can't spend a Top 10 pick on a QB and then still start your #1 overall pick in the last year of their contract. That act alone will cause a massive locker room rift/distraction that would be unavoidable.  Some players will question why you "wasted" a Top 10 pick on a QB you're not going to start instead of someone who can help right away.  While others will question why we are keeping Bryce around for the season when it's clear he's not the future guy at that point. It would just make for a bad start to the rookie's career while causing locker room distractions.  Again, I'd bet this has never happened in this league before with any 1st round QB, let alone the #1 overall pick, and there is a reason for it, which is that it would be epically stupid to do. And I used the Vikings as the example as they're the closest I can think of, because again, there isn't a direct comparison as nobody has ever done it because it's that dumb of an idea (no offense lol).
×
×
  • Create New...