Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norris on Panthers 1st round plans


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, shaqattaq said:

Eagles jump to #6 to grab a stud DE. We get #15 (Corral), #51 (best OL / DL available), #101, and Mr. Mustache  - who can compete with Corral or back him up for years to come.

Edit - OOPS, their pick is # 18, we might need a little more from them to make this happen

I could easy live with this sceniro if it happened.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think the cap room is insurance--if they trade back, do not get the qb, they can bring one in if necessary.  However, I really think part of the plan at QB is to see how Darnold does with an actual OL--

I think that is plan C, but it is a plan. 

I can see the Panthers wanting to give Darnold at least one more chance to prove they were not as inept as it has appeared by signing him and giving up draft choices. 

It is highly unlikely the Panthers will be a playoff team this year, so that gamble may not be as bad as it would appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how every fanbase wants to trade down and none want to trade up. Good look finding a trade partner, unless they intend on getting little to nothing in return I don’t see it.

 

If you think you have a franchise QB at 6 you pick him, it’s that simple.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Panthers are going to trade back at least once and walk away with Howell or Corral.  So it was written. 

I cant tell you all how much I am looking forward to my favorite 3 days of the year

I would be perfectly fine if they traded for Jimmy G and or Baker and Drafted a QB then sat said QB they drafted for the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

Funny how every fanbase wants to trade down and none want to trade up. Good look finding a trade partner, unless they intend on getting little to nothing in return I don’t see it.

 

If you think you have a franchise QB at 6 you pick him, it’s that simple.

I wanted to make the huge move to trade up for Burrow after we hired Joe Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Funny how every fanbase wants to trade down and none want to trade up. Good look finding a trade partner, unless they intend on getting little to nothing in return I don’t see it.

 

If you think you have a franchise QB at 6 you pick him, it’s that simple.

Yup you got teams like the Chiefs that have like too many draft picks and might move up but I really don't see us moving back to the 29th spot. Maybe the Eagles for a decent value, Seahawks/WFT moving up and giving us a 3rd or something to take a player we actually want...Horrible year to not have our 2nd and 3rd rounders. At least O-line is deep and there should still be some good players left in the 4th/5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yup you got teams like the Chiefs that have like too many draft picks and might move up but I really don't see us moving back to the 29th spot. Maybe the Eagles for a decent value, Seahawks/WFT moving up and giving us a 3rd or something to take a player we actually want...Horrible year to not have our 2nd and 3rd rounders. At least O-line is deep and there should still be some good players left in the 4th/5th

I would love someone to go to another teams forum and propose these trade ideas being floated round this thread. They will laugh you right out the forum.

 

The fact that in these made up scenarios we are only getting a second or third in return for swapping a top 10 pick goes to show how little value a top 10 pick in this draft has, no team would really want to trade.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...