Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Press Conference - McAdoo and Snow


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

Im fine rolling with Sam. Live or die with Darnold. 

I actually have hope that he will have a decent season this year. Kid still young. 

Could you imagine if he came out and put up a good season behind an actual OLine and took us to a winning record?

The Huddle wouldn't know how to handle it - they've been toxic about the guy from day 1. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Could you imagine if he came out and put up a good season behind an actual OLine and took us to a winning record?

The Huddle wouldn't know how to handle it - they've been toxic about the guy from day 1. 

Toxicity towards Sam since day 1 is deserved, especially so far in hindsight. Personally, I don't think Darnold is a good QB and the only way he can get us to a winning record, is with a roster that can baby him - a lot of handoffs to a healthy CMC and checkdowns. A control the game type of offense with a stout defense that rarely plays from behind. I don't think there are many teams, or many coaches, in the NFL that can provide an environment where Sam could "succeed".

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

So did Snow talk too?

Didn't say much besides Wilks wants to keep Chinn at Safety, and mentioning a bunch of LB's coming off the edge to replace Reddicks snaps. Which seems odd considering we were getting demolished in the run game last year playing lighter guys on the edges

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

"The way it is in the building right now, Sam is our starting quarterback" 

That quote doesn't mean poo if the building changes when we get another QB be it a rookie or Baker. 

Exactly he had to say that what else is he gonna say! IMO i really believe there gonna trade down from 6 because i can't see Fitty sitting around with no day 2 picks and draft a QB this year in the first round!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Could you imagine if he came out and put up a good season behind an actual OLine and took us to a winning record?

The Huddle wouldn't know how to handle it - they've been toxic about the guy from day 1. 

I would be the happiest drunk SOB in the joint.  I would dance my ass off if he miraculously took this team to the NFC championship game...

But then I woke up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Didn't say much besides Wilks wants to keep Chinn at Safety, and mentioning a bunch of LB's coming off the edge to replace Reddicks snaps. Which seems odd considering we were getting demolished in the run game last year playing lighter guys on the edges

I hope that's a smokescreen.  If not, expect to get ran all over.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I hope that's a smokescreen.  If not, expect to get ran all over.

Yeah I know Luvu is pretty good in that role, but wasn't expecting Luvu/Shaq/and Chinn to be his answer to losing a guy that basically played DE in a 4 man front. No problem with those guys blitzing with more traditional DE's on the line, or just go 3/4 if you want to send guys that light constantly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I know Luvu is pretty good in that role, but wasn't expecting Luvu/Shaq/and Chinn to be his answer to losing a guy that basically played DE in a 4 man front. No problem with those guys blitzing with more traditional DE's on the line, or just go 3/4 if you want to send guys that light constantly

I honestly hadn't heard of half the guys he mentioned that we signed.  I'm getting old. 

I get what he's saying and if it works they may just might make it work.  They have edge rushers, they just haven't gotten much playing time for one reason or another.  Depth is an issue as he repeatedly said. So have I by the way. The war of attrition is a big factor in success. 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Could you imagine if he came out and put up a good season behind an actual OLine and took us to a winning record?

The Huddle wouldn't know how to handle it - they've been toxic about the guy from day 1. 

That's revisionist history.  Sure some people have hated the trade since day 1.  But, plenty of people around here were overly optimistic about him last Summer.  Things didn't get fully "toxic" until he started stinking it up bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I honestly hadn't heard of half the guys he mentioned that we signed.  I'm getting old. 

I get what he's saying and if it works they may just might make it work.  They have edge rushers, they just haven't gotten much playing time for one reason or another.  Depth is an issue as he repeatedly said. So have I by the way. The war of attrition is a big factor in success. 

Yeah he also mentioned Cory Littleton, another LB. I'm hoping YGM actually gets some snaps because he has the size we need to seal the edge in the run game. We've been developing bad habits not playing our draft picks enough in favor of journeymen FA's. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...