Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Practice Facility Poll.


SizzleBuzz
 Share

Project resumes or permanently abandoned?  

131 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the Rock Hill facility project resume & ultimately be completed?



Recommended Posts

On 4/20/2022 at 10:52 AM, TheCasillas said:

good write up. Sounds like the Panthers did do their homework with this out they have in the deal. The pressure isnt on the panthers anymore, its on RH. They can easily build the facility on the other side of Moorehead, where they acquired the property late last year. 

*This*

If you've seen what the Cowboys have done in Frisco, TX and the Vikings with what they've done in Eagan, MN, they both include lots of retail. Restaurants, bars, shopping and Hall of Fames are included. This could have easily blended with Tepper's entertainment district that he wants included with the new stadium. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2022 at 10:52 AM, TheCasillas said:

They can easily build the facility on the other side of Moorehead, where they acquired the property late last year. 

If you are referencing what I think you are that's only 4 acres and completely isolated from the stadium and current practice facilities...

...don't think that will work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

If you are referencing what I think you are that's only 4 acres and completely isolated from the stadium and current practice facilities...

...don't think that will work. 

thats not what i am speaking to. Its the old pipe and foundry land. It's rumored to be where the new stadium will go.

here is the link

https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/david-tepper-buys-prime-land-near-bank-america-stadium/7WSWQBDXDBD2FHVZPGN2MY7D4I/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

thats not what i am speaking to. Its the old pipe and foundry land. It's rumored to be where the new stadium will go.

here is the link

https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/david-tepper-buys-prime-land-near-bank-america-stadium/7WSWQBDXDBD2FHVZPGN2MY7D4I/

Tepper hasn't bought any CP&F land.

He controls what you see outlined in yellow and he only "owns" the small tract farthest from the stadium...it's about 4-acres.

The land outlined in blue is CP&F land, about 30-acres...the rest of the CP&F is across the highway.

If Tepper could take control of everything you see highlighted in red he'd have a legit stadium site 👊.

 

 

9069D2E7-6C57-4420-A0D6-DA80CA41097E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Tepper hasn't bought any CP&F land.

He controls what you see outlined in yellow and he only "owns" the small tract farthest from the stadium...it's about 4-acres.

The land outlined in blue is CP&F land, about 30-acres...the rest of the CP&F is across the highway.

If Tepper could take control of everything you see highlighted in red he'd have a legit stadium site 👊.

 

 

9069D2E7-6C57-4420-A0D6-DA80CA41097E.jpeg

Thanks for the additional info, as of this moment its 4 acres, but the city agreeed to rezone it... the city would LOVE for Tepper to acquire the land and move the stadium further out from center. It would allow them to expand the skyline and use all of the existing space for commercial. The goal for the city by 2030 is to fill in the inner beltline as the new uptown. 

Tepper and the Panthers would be a piece to the puzzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

the city agreeed to rezone it

Helpful to give CP&F more development options and a better  valuation, 100% irrelevant to what ultimately happens with/on the property.  

 

24 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

...the city would LOVE for Tepper to acquire the land and move the stadium further out...

Doesn't matter what "the city" wants...

...and, that's nowhere near enough land for a proper stadium 👍.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...