Rich Eisen on Pelissero's QB piece

[LinvilleGorge]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Some guys are way bigger gambles than others.

There's no quarterback in this draft I'm willing to gamble on.

That's fine. There's always next year... when it'll be the same story again.

 

 

 

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

That's fine. There's always next year... when it'll be the same story again.

I hope not.

I don't need another season of Matt Rhule.

[LinvilleGorge]

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I hope not.

I don't need another season of Matt Rhule.

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

[jayflip]

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

I’m firmly in the draft a high upside QB and swing for the fences camp. Willis all day. Even if it’s somehow Willis, Icky and Neal available when we’re picking. 

Prior post regarding Joe Thomas and the browns was spot fuging on. 
 

 

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, jayflip said:

I’m firmly in the draft a high upside QB and swing for the fences camp. Willis all day. Even if it’s somehow Willis, Icky and Neal available when we’re picking. 

Prior post regarding Joe Thomas and the browns was spot fuging on. 
 

 

At some point you have to start swinging. What's the bigger opportunity cost, drafting a bust of a QB with good prospects at other positions available or drafting a good prospect at another position while passing on a legit QB?

If you need a QB then QB is always your #1 need and your #2 need almost becomes irrelevant. If we were smarter with how we targeted vet stop gaps we wouldn't be so desperate.

[Jaxel]

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

At some point you have to start swinging. What's the bigger opportunity cost, drafting a bust of a QB with good prospects at other positions available or drafting a good prospect at another position while passing on a legit QB?

If you need a QB then QB is always your #1 need and your #2 need almost becomes irrelevant. If we were smarter with how we targeted vet stop gaps we wouldn't be so desperate.

100% agree. Swing till you hit, no other position carries the same weight.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

THIS THREAD IS NEW AND REFRESHING!

 

Wait, no ... it's the same crap we've been reading for weeks.

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

THIS THREAD IS NEW AND REFRESHING!

 

Wait, no ... it's the same crap we've been reading for weeks.

You're in here complaining, so yeah. Business as usual.

 

[mrcompletely11]

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

I wanted fields last year.    I am pretty sure 100% of the huddle would have been okay with that pick the day after all things considered 

Edited April 23, 2022 by mrcompletely11

[micnificent28]

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't want to gamble at #6.

every pick is a gamble. 

[micnificent28]

2 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

So we’ll draft slow release, smol hands, old Kenny Pickett at #6 just because he’ll save Rhule’s job with an 8-9 season and he recruited him. 

pretty much cause hes safer in the short term this year sense.

[micnificent28]

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always a gamble. Y'all acting like a LT is a guarantee but just look at all the LT busts over the past two decades 

 

exactly!!!!!

[Shocker]

4 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Fun watch for the draft a QB  hopefuls.
 

 

Very interesting…thanks for post!

Personally think Howell is the best QB out of this draft but  that is just my opinion.  

Edited April 23, 2022 by Shocker

[Jackie Lee]

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I wanted fields last year.    I am pretty sure 100% of the huddle would have been okay with that pick the day after all things considered 

Fields should have been the pick even with Darnold and the 5th year option. If Darnold actually had worked out we could trade Fields above any of these current prospects easily for an extra 1st, or kept him on the cheap ready to go for next year. Obviously we should have kept Teddy and taken Fields but I still wanted him after the Darnold trade.