Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we not get a pick from green bay for robby?

RumHam

By RumHam,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Shocker said:

It would take some serious mind games to think Robbie is worth more than a 4th rounder 

A 4th sounds about right. We can package our 4ths to jump back into the 3rd. Gets rid of Robbie in case we trade for Baker and GB is in need of some speed at the WR position. Rodgers would keep him in check throughout the season. It makes a lot of sense really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Green Bay just added Sammy Watkins.  They just checked the Robby Anderson box with that. 

Plus, this draft leans WR too.  So why not just draft a cheap kid that runs fast.  9 WRs run a 4.3 in this draft.  9 more run a 4.4. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

Looking at the current market for wide receivers and possible future contracts well over 100 million dollars you can safely assume most teams will be looking to the draft if they want a wideout. The people who hate Robby might as well get comfortable it's gonna be awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Yeah but what are they going to do at WR for the other 14 games in the season?

18 kids in this draft run at least a 4.4.  Rookie's put up Robby Anderson numbers pretty often.   I just don't see why in this draft you would trade for Robby before or during the draft with all that out there.   You might could deal him after the draft. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • outlaw4
      Another Bryce breakdown

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      How many elite QBs do we have right now in the league? And how elite are they, really? Mahomes - I seriously doubt anyone would say otherwise. My only counterpoint is that since Tyreek left, he has not been as explosive. Only one with a ring. Allen - Yes. His first year was rough, however, and even now, he's a turnover machine which has cost his team games. Wouldn't surprise me if he regresses as talent around him goes elsewhere. Burrow - Can say he got to a Super Bowl but injuries may be a concern. All those sacks he took may be coming back to bite the Bengals. Jackson/Prescott - Can't win in the playoffs even with rosters around them, so no. So there you go. At least in my eyes, there's only maybe 3 right now. And over the past 10 years, QBs not Mahomes/Brady that have won were (noodle arm) Manning, Nick Foles and Matthew Stafford. Even Stafford I'd argue was a one-shot because the Rams absolutely went all-in with talent. 
    • chknwing
      Ok. This Was Pretty Cool

      By chknwing · Posted

    • Anybodyhome
      Off-season Thread

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      Without Guentzel, the team has a better chance of being able to keep Jarvy long term, Noesen for another 2-3 years, Drury and Turbo maybe. And I'm saying that because I think Jarvis will make us forget about Guentzel.
×
×
  • Create New...