Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2-3 predictions. Do the Panthers get a pick,?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Late first?

Ryan Reynolds Reaction GIF

Yes---there was talk of taking him at #2.  Most people thought 2 QBs would go in the first round.   I am not saying I would take him, but I was suggesting that someone in the late first might.  Would you call Pickett a "late first" guy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Yes---there was talk of taking him at #2.  Most people thought 2 QBs would go in the first round.   I am not saying I would take him, but I was suggesting that someone in the late first might.  Would you call Pickett a "late first" guy? 

I thought the first round had came and gone? You mean to tell me that I dreamed that we drafted Ikey last night? 

What did I miss? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if drafting a QB would indicate how much they like the QB or how much they dislike the other QB options. 

Baker:  diva, lives in stadium, cost almost $19m for 1 season, inconsistent, would cost us a pick to obtain him.

Jimmy G: would be rehabbing during OTAs and mini camps, cost about $25m for a season, and was mediocre on a team with Deebo and a stacked defense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Yes---there was talk of taking him at #2.  Most people thought 2 QBs would go in the first round.   I am not saying I would take him, but I was suggesting that someone in the late first might.  Would you call Pickett a "late first" guy? 

There was media talk.

If there's one thing I've learned, it's the media projections and predictions tend to bear little to no resemblance to discussions that go on in team war rooms.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...