Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport says it could have been Pickett

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

Corral was at the top.

All good.  

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I'll just say I've heard enough from Panthro to not doubt what he says. 

Now as far as Corrall vs. Willis vs. Pickett, it could be that the board was evolving and in flux throughout the process. 

Possible.

Said earlier that the team board and what Matt Rhule wanted may not have matched up.

(also factoring in Tepper's affinity for Pickett)

2 minutes ago, Panthro said:

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

See above.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Verge said:

It would have been Pickett or Penning for sure. Assuming the other tackles were gone too, which I guess was never going to happen as some expected. I highly doubt they would have taken Pickett over Neal or Cross, that is just not true lol

If the Tackles all went we would have had better trade down packages where taking those other players would make sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Centerfield Enthusiast

Centerfield

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I trust Panthro.  He has shared many things over the years well before they happened.

That, and John Ellis also reported last night or this morning that Corral was the #1 QB on our board.

This is BS.

This is BS and Corral being the #1 QB on our board is too 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

If they woulda been successful in trading up earlier before the Colts took Willis, I firmly believe he would've been the pick but the team didn't want to give up much to move. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...