Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A quote I'm happy to hear


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, panfanman said:

They can say that all they want.  The jury is still out on the development part.

And furthermore, if they are a draft and develope organization, they wouldn't have been trading away picks for vet players that we keep for 1 year and leave or exhibit problems on other teams.

Edited by panfanman
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panfanman said:

And furthermore, if they are a draft and develope organization, they wouldn't have been trading away picks for vet players that we keep for 1 year and leave or exhibit problems on teams.

There are things which may have been true last year that might no longer be true this year.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There are things which may have been true last year that might no longer be true this year.

Who is in charge of the development? Pretty sure it was the same guy as last year.

It sounds nice to say but we have seen zero examples of it under Rhule. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Who is in charge of the development? Pretty sure it was the same guy as last year.

It sounds nice to say but we have seen zero examples of it under Rhule. 

It's the model they want to follow...or at least the one that Fitterer wants to follow.

The actual execution of it might get a whole lot better if certain changes are made next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khyber53 said:

I like this draft, gives me some hope.

I said that about this time last year, too, though.

 

We should at least get a starter and maybe long term starter at LT. If so, it was a net win. The rest of the draft is pretty laughable. If Corral can at least be a journeyman backup level player, then his price would at least be worth it.

The rest of the players, well....it's an uphill battle for any player not in the top 3 rounds. If they don't pan out, it's not a tragedy, just a probability.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...