Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?


iamhubby1
 Share

With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?  

141 members have voted

  1. 1. With quality QB play. Is this roster ready to go?

    • NO.
      36
    • MAYBE. After all, we are still young.
      71
    • YES
      34


Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, iamhubby1 said:

IMO, this is the best roster we have had is a long while. Quality QB play would put us in the competitive bracket. I like Corall, and am hopeful he can rise to the occasion. Because if he can, we can be something.

We're still young and anything can happen.  Quality QB play will improve the team tremendously BUT. we still have a weak head coach in rhule.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an 8-9 win team with competent Corral QBing and, among other variables, Rivera as coach (especially considering that aside from Donte Jackson, everyone who didn't see eye-to-eye with him is no longer here).

That's only taking into account personnel and Ron's coaching strategy. But with Rhule, to whom history will be very unkind, 9 wins is a pipe dream.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

It's tough to say this roster is "ready to go" when the NFL world considers it to comprise the worst team in the league.

they must not know that we got THE Ben McAdoo now.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the athletic:

 

Panthers Under 5.5 (plus 115)

The Panthers improved their offensive line. Too bad Sam Darnold is still the QB. There is still some question as to whether Matt Rhule knows what he is doing, which is not ideal in Year 3. They have a shot thanks to their friendly schedule, but if they don’t split their first four games against the Browns, Giants, Saints and Cardinals, or sweep the Falcons, they are in big, big trouble

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

From the athletic:

 

Panthers Under 5.5 (plus 115)

The Panthers improved their offensive line. Too bad Sam Darnold is still the QB. There is still some question as to whether Matt Rhule knows what he is doing, which is not ideal in Year 3. They have a shot thanks to their friendly schedule, but if they don’t split their first four games against the Browns, Giants, Saints and Cardinals, or sweep the Falcons, they are in big, big trouble

Vegas knows what they are doing.  That line is perfect.  I wouldn't know what do with it.  Gut says 6 wins though. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...