Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Basbear said:

I maybe wrong, but I think Finessere has already traded away 2 picks in 2023(i know the 3rd is gone). But I believe panthers have bufflaos 7th form the LB aSmith deal from 2 years ago. *Now I member, panthers dont have a 6th due the gilmore trade....so yes 2(3rd&6th) picks already gone......ugh

With the unknown I do wish would feeze using future picks given the coaching deal....

Fitt has shown the propensity to trade for the "now" and not pay as much attention to "tomorrow." TBD if this is more him or more Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

You don’t put great QBs on the trading block. You also don’t trade away 3 1st rounders to replace them. Their head coach is also a “winner” with the same record and he wants to move on from Jimmy. 

Matthew Stafford, Tom Brady and Manning were all either traded or released and went on to win SBs.

 Shanahan is 8-28 without JimmyG.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Fitt has shown the propensity to trade for the "now" and not pay as much attention to "tomorrow." TBD if this is more him or more Rhule.

Its probably more Rhule.  Rhule is the one talking about how he didn't want to start with a few losing seasons like he did in college.  That he wanted to win now.  That didn't work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Its probably more Rhule.  Rhule is the one talking about how he didn't want to start with a few losing seasons like he did in college.  That he wanted to win now.  That didn't work out.

I think we all HOPE that is the case. My fear is that Rhule has been running this show the whole time. Well guess who chose Fitterer.....Matt Rhule.

That's my biggest fear, that we find out Fitterer is just as ill suited to his job as Rhule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Matthew Stafford, Tom Brady and Manning were all either traded or released and went on to win SBs.

 Shanahan is 8-28 without JimmyG.

Only Stafford was traded because HE requested it. The others two were past their mid 30s and WANTED to go somewhere else after their contracts were up. Let’s also not act like Manning was the reason the Broncos won that Super Bowl. Also imagine Detroit trading 3 first round picks for a QB while Stafford was in his prime? No one questioned the Niners doing it for a reason.

Why are their no trade offers for Jimmy right now? Shouldn’t teams be all over a QB that can win. You know who else was a “winner” despite average stats? Teddy. When he went to a below average team he was horribly exposed and went 5-11. 

Edited by ForJimmy
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

Nah, won't be Jimmy.

The Jimmy thing never made any sense to me.  He won’t even be able to start throwing until mid to late summer off the injury.

 

and don’t we already have a former franchise QB who wasn’t the same after a major shoulder injury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Why are their no trade offers for Jimmy right now?

Because the 49'ers are waiting for him to heal from surgery and show he's 100% so he can bring fair value.

The GM is on the record saying he will be fine with it if The Jimmy-G Man comes back and plays for the 49ers again...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Media touting tonight as The Shedaur Show

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • kungfoodude
      Coach asked about Coker!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...