Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Steve Reed reports "the Panthers are still interested in" Jimmy Garoppolo


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

lol 

Sizzle logic 

Jared Goff is a game changer 

Matt Stafford is a bum 

I have a theory that Sizzle is a troll alt created by Igo for clicks and entertainment.  It makes his posts more enjoyable anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I have a theory that Sizzle is a troll alt created by Igo for clicks and entertainment.  It makes his posts more enjoyable anyway...

Pretty sure Sizzle is our old friend Sanjay.

Same MO: gets fixated on things (two TE sets, the Appaloosa Model), wants people to think he's smarter, responds as if he's proven something when he obviously hasn't, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Pretty sure Sizzle is our old friend Sanjay.

Same MO: gets fixated on things (two TE sets, the Appaloosa Model), wants people to think he's smarter, responds as if he's proven something when he obviously hasn't, etc.

We need to bring back our old friend Alejandro Lustra. He may have been an insufferable PITA, but he made things more entertaining than Fire Rhule every day. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

It takes time to turn around a complex business organization like an NFL team (a point clearly lost on you 🤦‍♂️).

In baseball parlance we are in the top of the 2nd inning with no outs and a 2-2 count…

…get back to me during the 7th inning stretch on Big Tepp’s “record” 🤣👊.

"Turning around" would imply the business was struggling prior.

The Panthers were historically a franchise that stayed away from the bottom in favor of the middle with a couple blips to the very top.

The franchise needs "turning around" after all the errors were made by Tepper himself. While I am glad they brought back Wilkes and brought in McAdoo, who I'm high on, the bar has been set so very low since Tepper acquired the franchise four years ago, middle ground would be a big step up. 

Turning things around to crawl back to up to the middle from self inflicted wounds is hardly worth a slow clap.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Plenty of teams have produced winning programs in less time.

"You are what your record says you are" was your standard.

By that standard (again, as applied by you) David Tepper is, after four years under his watch, a sh-tty owner. No amount of attempted spin will change that.

I'd guess that he might not like hearing that you consider him terrible at his job.

You are clueless 🤦‍♂️...

...carry on blowhard, you probably need another 30 posts  before midnight to keep up with your daily average 🤣...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rippadonn said:

"Turning around" would imply the business was struggling prior.

The Panthers were historically a franchise that stayed away from the bottom in favor of the middle with a couple blips to the very top.

The franchise needs "turning around" after all the errors were made by Tepper himself. While I am glad they brought back Wilkes and brought in McAdoo, who I'm high on, the bar has been set so very low since Tepper acquired the franchise four years ago, middle ground would be a big step up. 

Turning things around to crawl back to up to the middle from self inflicted wounds is hardly worth a slow clap.

👆☝️👆☝️bovine dung of the highest order... 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SizzleBuzz said:

You are clueless 🤦‍♂️...

...carry on blowhard, you probably need another 30 posts  before midnight to keep up with your daily average 🤣...

To defeat you in debate generally only takes one.

As soon as you realize you have no response you start replying with stuff like this, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

To defeat you in debate generally only takes one.

As soon as you realize you have no response you start replying with stuff like this, so...

The fact remains, turnarounds are complex and time consuming...

...if you had any business expertise or experience of any kind you'd understand this but in fact, you are clueless...

...lemme guess, stay at home sloth 🦥 ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

The fact remains, turnarounds are complex and time consuming...

...if you had any business expertise or experience of any kind you'd understand this but in fact, you are clueless...

...lemme guess, stay at home sloth 🦥 ?

The fact remains that football is not business.

The fact also remains that others have done it in less time, but Tepper still hasn't done it at all.

Heck, the team hasn't even shown improvement yet. If anything, they've gotten worse.

Which means again, using the standard that you applied, Tepper is a loser.

(and here I thought you liked him)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The fact remains that football is not business.

The fact also remains that others have done it in less time, but Tepper still hasn't done it at all.

Heck, the team hasn't even shown improvement yet. If anything, they've gotten worse.

Which means again, using the standard that you applied, Tepper is a loser.

(and here I thought you liked him)

Yeah the team has been worse than before under Tepper. I think Tepper still has a chance to be a good owner, but Sizzle logic shows us “you are what your record is.” Guess Jimmy G is the next great QB and so is PJ Walker (never lost), while Tepper is terrible…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...