Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers staff not all on same page about acquiring Browns QB Baker Mayfield


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Per numerous credible reports he would've already been traded if the Browns were willing to take on more of his salary. They're just not yet willing to accept the market price. Hence why if I was Mayfield I'd ratchet up the noise to force my way out. I mean, the rest of the league already knows he's toxic.

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

😂

Mayfield is a reclamation project. He's gotta get out of Cleveland to start that. As soon as he's out he can come out and ah shucks it up and simply say that he was doing what he had to do to get himself out of the "Mistake by the Lake".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

Mayfield is a reclamation project. He's gotta get out of Cleveland to start that. As soon as he's out he can come out and ah shucks it up and simply say that he was doing what he had to do to get himself out of the "Mistake by the Lake".

 

You seem to think that demanding more money is his way out. 

 

I believe that it would not only not work, it would damage his already shaky reputation.

 

The longer the season goes on, with no movement for Baker. The better the odds are that some team may come up with an offer the Browns will take. But as of right now? The Browns are not moving off their stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

 

It's a rookie deal, that money is guaranteed.

They could try to take it from him but it really wouldn't matter. Still counts against the cap. 

I also think the Browns have basically already moved on. I don't think they are interested in a malcontent QB torpedoing their season.

If he holds out, he loses the money and an accrued  season.  Similar to the Leveon Bell situation.  Baker is not going to hold out and lose all that money.  It’s only guaranteed if he reports.

now - he could pull a Jerome Bettis and fake an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Smithers said:

If he holds out, he loses the money and an accrued  season.  Similar to the Leveon Bell situation.  Baker is not going to hold out and lose all that money.  It’s only guaranteed if he reports.

now - he could pull a Jerome Bettis and fake an injury.

I suspect they would just go the Deshaun Watson route and pay him to stay home. Better for both of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

So you want him to add fuel to the fire that is his reputation, by demanding even more money? Way to torpedo your future.

 

Face it. You made a silly comment. It happens.

I mean, I understand what you're saying, but I think there are layers to this which everyone is aware of, and as such I don't necessarily buy into the opinion that he'd be torpedoing his future by playing hardball with the Browns. Sure, I don't think Mayfield is all that, but I do recognize that I could be wrong and that he has enough questions around his career that someone may still want to take a chance on him. That being said, if  someone really believes that Baker has untapped franchise-level talent---value, then he's going to get another shot, regardless of what goes on with the Browns.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I mean, I understand what you're saying, but I think there are layers to this which everyone is aware of, and as such I don't necessarily buy into the opinion that he'd be torpedoing his future by playing hardball with the Browns. Sure, I don't think Mayfield is all that, but I do recognize that I could be wrong and that he has enough questions around his career that someone may still want to take a chance on him. That being said, if  someone really believes that Baker has untapped franchise-level talent---value, then he's going to get another shot, regardless of what goes on with the Browns.

 

There are a myriad of ways this can go. But Baker demanding more money? That ain't one of them.

Edited by iamhubby1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

 

There are a myriad of ways this can go. But Baker demanding more money? That ain't one of them.

I agree, but LG was just musing and licking his chops over imaginative possibilities. Mayfield demanding more money would make for a helluva soap opera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I agree, but LG was just musing and licking his chops over imaginative possibilities. Mayfield demanding more money would make for a helluva soap opera. 

 

Ok then.

 

So the next time I get called out for saying something silly. I'll just say I was musing. No harm, no foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

No he doesn't.  The Browns have him by the balls.  He signed a contract, they guaranteed his salary this year.  If he holds out, he doesn't get the year credit, so he would have to play for the Browns in 2023 under that 18 million.

Now, the Browns could ask him to NOT report.  They would still be on the hook for his salary in that case, but Baker would get his year credit and the ability to go wherever he wants next offseason.  It also wouldn't preclude him being traded in the future . . . but that's another (*@# show waiting to happen.

It's just a completely toxic situation for all parties because it was handled incredibly poorly.

Unless the rules changed in the last CBA, as long as Baker reports by Week 10, he gets credit for an accrued season. By that point, the Browns season could already be in deep trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, philit99 said:

I think swapping Sam for Baker is the best for both sides. We get a one year rental and they get a starter while Watson is out, win/win or lose/lose depending on how you see it.

I can't see them taking on Darnold. If we actually think Corral is the future I'd stay away from Baker's toxicity. You can be toxic IF you're elite. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...