Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Add sexual assault to the Dan Snyder allegations


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

They’ll probably just try to turn the narrative to her breaking the NDA and say she’s untrustworthy because she broke a legally binding agreement, ignoring the fact of the sexual assault.

Not so sure about that.

If the NFL wants Snyder gone (and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they do) then he's gonna have a rough time making this go away.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Can we get you to sign an NDA to stop posting here 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

So what are the expectations on "NDA's"...

...should ladies who have accepted a large cash-payments in lieu of signing an "NDA" and agreed to keep their mouth shut...

...be required to live up to the legally binding agreement they committed to?

Or not?

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Good grief. Does your billionaire simping know no bounds?

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Actually, what I'm getting at is...

...should the 20 ladies who are entering into NDA's with Mr. Whip-It-Out expected to live up to their contractual obligations in return for the cash payments they will collect?

Or, once they collect the cash are they free to violate the legally-binding contract they signed and go on and spill the goods publicly?

What say ye?

They are subject to legal ramifications in some situations such as, say, blasting on a media platform for no purpose other than for defamation. That can include monetary.

But it’s not that simple. NDAs are not some sort of top secret kept until death issuance no one has a right to. NDA’s are a ‘private contract’ and are not exempt from the law. They aren’t exempt from a judge. The information is not even exempt from lawyers. They especially, aren’t exempt when similar behavior branches out into other, similar, separate crimes. Even if unrelated. 

NDAs can be ordered to be disclosed under a variety of conditions and what the media does with it, should they be able to obtain the information, is not in the control of the designee or parties of the NDA.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...