-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
.thumb.jpg.77b319138d80bbaeee0b205bb9253f9c.jpg)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
By kungfoodude · Posted
I would say that Johnson and Theilen are the only non-replacement level players in our WR corps. So we at least have two guys that have a prayer of getting open in a given game. The rest of that group?? Woof. -
By PNW_PantherMan · Posted
He's Dak Prescott. Or as he's known in certain circles, Stat Padscott. -
Um, yes you do. Isn't saying they drafted "for development" a case of you putting words in my mouth? Aren't you assuming that "developmental" means that he can't contribute from day 1? There is no recipe for drafting players; if you could bottle it, I am sure all GMs would buy it-you are pretending to know what nobody knows. That said, Name a player in this draft who was available at 32 who does not need development? But to assume that I understand your intent--you think that drafting raw talent with limited experience is not as good as someone who has demonstrated their full potential, correct? With that, the term "ceiling" is applicable, and you are saying that a player with a limited ceiling (because their skills were measurable and nobody drafted them until 32) is more valuable than a player with a higher ceiling. The draft is mining for talent, and diamonds do not come out of the mine already cut and set in gold. Coach em up.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.