Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How the Mayfield trade came about


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

From the flipside, and analysis of how the relationship between the Browns and Mayfield broke down...

This writer clearly isn't a Mayfield fan, but he also shines a light on some petty and unprofessional behavior from Stefanski and the Browns.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

Sounds like Tepper was the voice of reason in this whole process.

Wouldn't go that far...

There's more in the article, but the basic gist of it is that he wanted to get Mayfield for as little as possible. (so did Fitterer).

What strikes me the most about how the story went down is that, as has happened a few times before, we were basically only bidding against ourselves.

But this time, instead of raising the price, we actually managed to lower it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

this is kind of funny....

 

Heh 😆

Someone else pointed out that the Browns will be paying both Baker Mayfield and Deshaun Watson for 2022 but may not have either of them.

Andrew Berry it's a lot of praise as a GM but that situation is a mess.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

A drinking game but every time @Mr. Scotitalicizes a word, you take a shot. 

A habit I stole from Stephen King 😆

Can't provide tone of voice in a written format so if you want to emphasize something, you have to use visual cues.

In the case of extended quotes like this one though, it's because the board's quote function on mobile became kind of wonky during a previous software upgrade.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wouldn't go that far...

There's more in the article, but the basic gist of it is that he wanted to get Mayfield for as little as possible. (so did Fitterer).

What strikes me the most about how the story went down is that, as has happened a few times before, we were basically only bidding against ourselves.

But this time, instead of raising the price, we actually managed to lower it.

I got the distinct impression it worked out that way because the rumored other suitor was Seattle.  Had they trotted out somebody else, we might well have had Darnold II, The Sequel. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

I got the distinct impression it worked out that way because the rumored other suitor was Seattle.  Had they trotted out somebody else, we might well have had Darnold II, The Sequel. 

Possible. I'd like to think that Scott Fitterer isn't prone to being fooled by these sorts of things like Marty Hurney was though (behind the scenes draft video bolsters that argument).

But yeah, you'd have to think of all people, Fitterer would have a pretty good idea whether his old Seattle colleagues were bluffing or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Possible. I'd like to think that Scott Fitterer isn't prone to being fooled by these sorts of things like Marty Hurney was though (behind the scenes draft video bolsters that argument).

But yeah, you'd have to think of all people, Fitterer would have a pretty good idea whether his old Seattle colleagues were bluffing or not.

Seattle was not interested. Ian Rap shot down Josinas rumors and said Seattle was never interested. No one was besides us. Most teams are hesitant to do any deals w the Browns after the Watson incident and that contract. Then there is us who was willing to give up anything for Watson and when we didn't get him traded for the Watson sweepstakes winner's back up lol.

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...