Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Carolina Panthers are owned by a Dan Snyder clone


tiger7_88
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's not Snyder level yet but very few in this thread willing to defend him. He has been wrong on every decision, and is trying to stiff a bunch businesses over the practice facility fiasco. Hope they stick it to him and he is forced to sell.  Seems like a Snyder in training right now and sexual harassment claims would not surprise me.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Behind Closed Doors:  A Fly on the Wall Perspective of NFL Owner Daniel Snyder at Work

 

 

Somebody placed a hidden camera in the Foreskins' headquarters?

Funny, I watched that movie again for the first time in ages on Sunday.  I am still laughing about parts of it three days later.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Snyder? No. Jerry Jones lite possibly.

 

5 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I don't see it. He may be too involved, but he's never gone out of his way to be in front of cameras, interviewed, nor has he pretended to be the GM in the draft room.

I don't even really see any credible evidence that he's "too involved", in fact I see reports and actions to the contrary. Sure, he was highly involved with the Rhule hire, but what owner isn't involved in that level of hire? I would presume that he was highly involved with the GM's hire as well.  But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

I don't even really see any credible evidence that he's "too involved", in fact I see reports and actions to the contrary. Sure, he was highly involved with the Rhule hire, but what owner isn't involved in that level of hire? I would presume that he was highly involved with the GM's hire as well.  But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

Involved with the coaching search is scary enough for me. It's going to take a lot to make up for his trust in Hurney and his lust for Watson.  Not to mention the RH fiasco. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherPhann89 said:

For me, the jury is still out on Tepper's ownership. Yes, he believed in Rhule and showed his support of Rhule with money and control. Being wrong, maybe, doesn't make him a bad owner, nor does not firing Rhule when there's a lot of financial commitment remaining in his contract. 

I don't know all of the in's and out's of the Rockhill situation. But like I said,  for me,  it's still up in the air. 

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

the GM literally said yesterday that Tepper would be involved in who they actually decide to start at QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Involved with the coaching search is scary enough for me. It's going to take a lot to make up for his trust in Hurney and his lust for Watson.  Not to mention the RH fiasco. 

Fair! Though I will say that he was still just dipping his toe in the water with Hurney. He was going through the motions of an inevitable conclusion. I'm not going to ding him for not having enough experience or being cerebral before reacting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CRA said:

the GM literally said yesterday that Tepper would be involved in who they actually decide to start at QB. 

He also literally said in that same exact answer, that Rhule has final say.  Which is exactly what was literally said in the post you quoted that you're trying to refute. Lol.

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, top dawg said:

Snyder is a straight up sleezeball and crook. He's also low-key meddlesome (or at least has been). 

You could switch "Snyder" with "Tepper," and this still makes perfect sense. Tepper has absolutely been prone to knee-jerk decisions. All things considered with injuries, Tepper has had a different starting QB take most of the snaps every year he's owned the team.

2018: Cam Newton
2019: Kyle Allen
2020: Teddy Bridgewater
2021: Sam Darnold
2022: Baker Mayfield

If anything, he's trained what's left of the fanbase to know not to buy a Mayfield jersey now, to wait until December, when they're $29.99 at Dick's Sporting Goods, and to apply the same approach to Carson Wentz's jersey next year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

He also literally said in that same exact answer, that Rhule has final say.  Which is exactly what was literally said in the post you quoted that you're trying to refute. Lol.

 

I don't think Tepper's deference to Rhule is the plus that you're implying it is. If anything, it underscores his ineptitude even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...