Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another key Carolina Panthers executive leaves Tepper Sports


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

yup… what I’m referring to is do we know if he went out and searched for Glick? Or was this suggested by referral or sought out by his recruitment team?

We don’t know if he hand pick Glick. We do know that they have not worked together in the past and that tepper had an immediate appetite for pulling together a soccer club for Charlotte.

if his team served him glick based on their discussions and interview process, then we can’t say tepper hand picked him. There is a process to all hires, and we can’t 100% confidently say “glick was tepper’s guy” without insight into their hiring and recruitment process 

he had history with Hart bc they worked together in Pittsburgh. So you can argue that he hand picked Mike hart 

Excellent post 🫵.

That said, Tepper never had any "work" role in Pittsburgh just as Elliot Close as a 5% Panthers owner had no operating role whatsoever...

...5% owners are just along for the ride.

Obviously the access afforded by 5% owners likely gave Tepper an avenue to get to know certain Steelers exec's but Tepper lived and worked in NJ/NY and it's unlikely he really spent much time hanging around the halls at Steelers HQ 🤙.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Excellent post 🫵.

That said, Tepper never had any "work" role in Pittsburgh just as Elliot Close as a 5% Panthers owner had no operating role whatsoever...

...5% owners are just along for the ride.

Obviously the access afforded by 5% owners likely gave Tepper an avenue to get to know certain Steelers exec's but Tepper lived and worked in NJ/NY and it's unlikely he really spent much time hanging around the halls at Steelers HQ 🤙.

The real question is how tepper gets any work done with you glued to his hip all day 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheCasillas said:


I’m on vacation this week and been drinking all day, need a little wiggle room on names. 

also, if you think tepper went out and searched for Glick all by himself… then you are very disconnected from how agencies like TSE find their talent.  Calling my suggestion a huge stretch is a stretch in itself. Why would tepper spend weeks by himself searching for someone when he could hire professionals who are good at it to do it for him? That doesn’t sound very billionaire like….

Even if that scenario is true, who made the final decision?

For that matter, if Tepper has other people making those decisions, and those people are doing their jobs poorly, it's still ultimately falls on him.

He's the guy at the top, so the buck stops at his desk.

The bottom line here is that you're strangly looking for some kind of circumstance that absolves Tepper from blame for bad hires. Don't know why, but that's your thing right now.

Are you planning to apply the same method to clear Tepper of blame for hiring Matt Rhule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheCasillas said:


I’m on vacation this week and been drinking all day, need a little wiggle room on names. 
 

also, if you think tepper went out and searched for Glick all by himself… then you are very disconnected from how agencies like TSE find their talent.  Calling my suggestion a huge stretch is a stretch in itself. Why would tepper spend weeks by himself searching for someone when he could hire professionals who are good at it to do it for him? That doesn’t sound very billionaire like….

maybe the billionaire should of taken your advice when he was head coach searching.  But instead it was just him Marty Hurney rushing and then doing a complete brain dead contract on top of that lol.   Then let him bring in an all college staff lol. 

I mean, Tepper could of used google and done a better job when it came to that hire and all that went into it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Even if that scenario is true, who made the final decision?

For that matter, if Tepper has other people making those decisions, and those people are doing their jobs poorly, it's still ultimately falls on him.

He's the guy at the top, so the buck stops at his desk.

The bottom line here is that you're strangly looking for some kind of circumstance that absolves Tepper from blame for bad hires. Don't know why, but that's your thing right now.

Are you planning to apply the same method to clear Tepper of blame for hiring Matt Rhule?

The part in bold I agree with and I alluded to in my previous posts. 
 

Tepper is accountable for everything that happens at TSE and BoA… there is no denying that. I’m not absolving Tepper. I am adding the perspective that he didn’t make this decisions in isolation and that it’s very possible that the people he has hired came highly recommended. That’s it.

 

please stop using your hate for Rhule and tepper to create a narrative that I’m “absolving” tepper. I have denied that multiple times already and attempted to explain myself, but you seem to be stuck on the notion that I am protecting tepper. From my experience working with TSE … Tepper isn’t as close as people perceive and portray here.  That’s it.

 

i think any continuation of this conversation is just going to be a circle jerk. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The part in bold I agree with and I alluded to in my previous posts. 
 

Tepper is accountable for everything that happens at TSE and BoA… there is no denying that. I’m not absolving Tepper. I am adding the perspective that he didn’t make this decisions in isolation and that it’s very possible that the people he has hired came highly recommended. That’s it.

 

please stop using your hate for Rhule and tepper to create a narrative that I’m “absolving” tepper. I have denied that multiple times already and attempted to explain myself, but you seem to be stuck on the notion that I am protecting tepper. From my experience working with TSE … Tepper isn’t as close as people perceive and portray here.  That’s it.

 

i think any continuation of this conversation is just going to be a circle jerk. 

Ah yes, the "you just hate them" argument.

Congrats. You've managed to place yourself on par with Sizzlebuzz.

As far as how your arguments read, pretty sure I'm not the only one interpreting it as defending Tepper. But I suppose you'll say the others just "hate" him as well.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Ah yes, the "you just hate them" argument.

Congrats. You've managed to place yourself on par with Sizzlebuzz.

As far as how your arguments read, pretty sure I'm not the only one interpreting it as defending Tepper. But I suppose you'll say the others just "hate" him as well.

You’ve openly stated that you despise Rhule and tepper. If you don’t then I recant my sbove statement. You are really trying to turn this convo into a thing. 


I’m moving on from this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

You’ve openly stated that you despise Rhule and tepper. If you don’t then I recant my sbove statement. You are really trying to turn this convo into a thing. 


I’m moving on from this. 

I've never openly stated any such thing.

I think both of them are terrible at their jobs, but as I've stated many times being terrible at your job is not a reason to hate someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've never openly stated any such thing.

I think both of them are terrible at their jobs, but as I've stated many times being terrible at your job is not a reason to hate someone.

Okay - bc its been five minutes and I can’t edit my above post… correction to my word usage of hate to “despise” or “dislike” or anything synonymous with how you feel about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Okay - bc its been five minutes and I can’t edit my above post… correction to my word usage of hate to “despise” or “dislike” or anything synonymous with how you feel about them.

Whatever's synonymous with "think he's a terrible owner".

No personal feelings involved...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I some elsewhere that they basically kicked out a flea market and neighboring skate park for this development. That in itself is super lame 

The city did A while ago it just wasn’t being enforced. That’s why it’s become a hot topic at city Council meetings now trying to find them somewhere to go this is more political than anything. 
 

 

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...