Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thursday Panthers Camp Updates


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Splitting 1st team reps should be a little more balanced. Every other day has too many variables with weather and fatigue. Don't see how they can keep it 50/50 too much longer though

 

I know rhule hate is pretty common now but how has there been no evaluations yet? He’s basically saying they’ve wasted two days. Laziest Coach I’ve ever seen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Sounds like Darnold is trying to win the job by not fuging up/checking almost everything down, and Baker is going all out no fear style. 

 

That’s been Sam’s M.O. his whole career. It’s Clausenesque the way he dinks and dunks the ball around. It’s what also could end CMC for good.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dxpanther said:

that's because we're talking about the post of being early! wtf.

 

it's nonsense and shouldn't even be a factor. it's literally just a wankfest fans to see who has the lunchiest lunch pail, bluest blue collar, suckiest suck-up mentality. it doesnt matter when discussing who's first on field by a matter of minutes. that's it. nothing to go off of.

if one of my reports shows up to an office meeting 15min early, im telling their ass to get back to their desk and answer some emails. no one is impressed by your gimmicks of wannabe leadership.

You're probably the guy.that shows up at 0759 for a 0800 work shift

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dxpanther said:

in the unlikely case you can't decide between two players, i'd really hope they would just have it decided by a foot race or three cone. giving it to the guy that puts his pads on and his shoes faster is just asinine to me.

We have limited access to the players' development.  Being first on the field is a symptom of an eager, competitive person who is ready to go.  For example, sitting on the front row in school does not mean you are getting an A, but more kids from the front row make As compared to those who sit in the back.  You do not give As to the kids based on where they sit, but it is a fair indicator of their work ethic.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You're probably the guy.that shows up at 0759 for a 0800 work shift

im they guy the cares more about people's work and production and where they finish, than who's standing around on the field and stretching a whole 5 minutes before everyone else. 

it's pointless and useless information. like that idiot kid who was sleeping in his car in front of the stadium trying to prove how bad he wanted it. coaches and players dont care. it's just feel good bs for the fans and reporters.

 

i could do this all day haha.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

People keep bringing up how Baker didn't perform with so many weapons in Cleveland, but honestly 1) he did when healthy, as his 2020 season is severely overlooked by most, and 2) he did NOT have a weapon like DJ, ever.  Landry is a great route runner but most people on this board walk faster than he runs and OBJ has been living off of his rep from his first three seasons with Giants ever since...  he never had a WR the caliber of DJ.  And to be honest, when Robbie is ON, he is far better than Landry as well.  Baker is going to look better and better the more reps he gets and the more comfortable he gets with the playbook.  

Love the early results!

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Sounds like Darnold is trying to win the job by not fuging up/checking almost everything down, and Baker is going all out no fear style. 

 

It's the same garbage he did last year.  Smh...  I really wish they would quit wasting reps on him.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, trueblade said:

 

Not understanding this charade at all.  Yall had all last season to try BC at LT and you didn't want to.  But now, with a widely-regarded franchise LT on the roster, let's pretend we're gonna a play BC over him!

Only grace I'll give the staff is Campen wasn't here last year, so he may want a look at everybody, but other than that, fug all that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...