Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Training Camp Wednesday 8-10 Discussion


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, frankw said:

Only team in history to go from 15 wins and a Super Bowl apperance to 6 wins the following season. Gettleman was the decision maker responsible for our Super Bowl window with that core slamming shut within one season. No sugar coating it.

Part if that had to do with Goodell as well. Scheduling our season opener against Denver then letting them tee off on Cam again. While I don't think that was the all inclusive reason, it was a clear message to the rest of the league that the rules didn't apply to Cam. It was just one of many things that didn't go our way. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’m excited to see Baker and Corral Saturday.

I’m hopeful Baker becomes a top 10-12 QB like he was in 2020 and at the same time I’m excited about Matt Corral. Corral was my favorite QB in the draft.

I’m not expecting to see much from Corral on Saturday. He is at a massive disadvantage given his lack of reps throughout practice. Which is something I hope everyone remembers come Saturday. 

Wasting reps on Sam is the most baffling thing in the world. They’re wasting valuable reps that would greatly benefit Baker. 

I am on board with how they are handling the QB situation.  From a team perspective I believe it is much healthier to let Baker earn the starting spot.  Makes for a better locker room.  Also, as someone said, the team needs to keep Sam engaged in a good way as we need him to be the backup.  I know hating on everything Rhule is the fav sport here (and I am not a fan either) but I like what they are doing here.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, frankw said:

Only team in history to go from 15 wins and a Super Bowl apperance to 6 wins the following season. Gettleman was the decision maker responsible for our Super Bowl window with that core slamming shut within one season. No sugar coating it.

It was mainly injuries that did it.

Everyone on the line got hurt at one point or another that year, we were on third string tackles, centers, and fourth string guards most of the season, and let's not forget 2016 is the year that Cam hurt his shoulder and never returned to form. 

We were back in the playoffs the next season once we were able to field a line that had actual NFL level talent on it, but then all of our WRs got hurt/weren't very good (Gettleman gets some blame for this) and that cost us the playoff game against the saints. 

18 was When Hurney had control again and that's when the wheels started falling completely off and Cam's shoulder got reaggravated and.

Like it or not, Gettleman has probably been the team's best GM even if it's not saying much. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Like it or not, Gettleman has probably been the team's best GM even if it's not saying much. 

Disagree wholeheartedly.

He rode the Hurney-built team to the Super Bowl and milked it for everything he could.

Other than that, his claims to fame were "making the tough decisions."  What that actually translated to was dismantling a team by getting rid of stars without replacing them AND without fixing cap woes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It was mainly injuries that did it.

Everyone on the line got hurt at one point or another that year, we were on third string tackles, centers, and fourth string guards most of the season, and let's not forget 2016 is the year that Cam hurt his shoulder and never returned to form. 

We were back in the playoffs the next season once we were able to field a line that had actual NFL level talent on it, but then all of our WRs got hurt/weren't very good (Gettleman gets some blame for this) and that cost us the playoff game against the saints. 

18 was When Hurney had control again and that's when the wheels started falling completely off and Cam's shoulder got reaggravated and.

Like it or not, Gettleman has probably been the team's best GM even if it's not saying much. 

song GIF

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, coffee said:

Disagree wholeheartedly.

He rode the Hurney-built team to the Super Bowl and milked it for everything he could.

Other than that, his claims to fame were "making the tough decisions."  What that actually translated to was dismantling a team by getting rid of stars without replacing them AND without fixing cap woes.

Hurney drafted the stars, I won't argue that, but it was not his team that he built. 

Hurney Teams were always top heavy with a STEEP drop off from the starters to the backups.

Gettleman's teams, while stacked with Hurney's super stars in Cam, Luke, Olsen, and TD also had better, more competent depth and a less severe decline from first string to second string. Teams with no depth rarely succeed, hence why Hurney Teams only had 3 winning seasons in 15 years as GM.

3/5 > 3/15

people jim GIF

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hurney drafted the stars, I won't argue that, but it was not his team that he built. 

Hurney Teams were always top heavy with a STEEP drop off from the starters to the backups.

Gettleman's teams, while stacked with Hurney's super stars in Cam, Luke, Olsen, and TD also had better, more competent depth and a less severe decline from first string to second string. Teams with no depth rarely succeed, hence why Hurney Teams only had 3 winning seasons in 15 years as GM.

I agree that it's a bigger drop-off from a star to a JAG than it is from a JAG to a JAG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, coffee said:

Disagree wholeheartedly.

He rode the Hurney-built team to the Super Bowl and milked it for everything he could.

Other than that, his claims to fame were "making the tough decisions."  What that actually translated to was dismantling a team by getting rid of stars without replacing them AND without fixing cap woes.

Garbage. Hurney’s Built team was two no brainer top ten picks,  a cap disaster and 2-14, 6-10, 7-9, his last 3 seasons. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, coffee said:

I agree that it's a bigger drop-off from a star to a JAG than it is from a JAG to a JAG.

Hurney Backups weren't even JAGs man, half of them were out of the league before their rookie contracts were up.

And it's a little disingenuous to call guys like Norwell, Turner, Short, Lotulelei, Oher, Harper, Tillman, Coleman, and Cotchery JAGs. All were good to great that season and major contributors to the team that season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ricky Spanish said:

It was mainly injuries that did it.

Everyone on the line got hurt at one point or another that year, we were on third string tackles, centers, and fourth string guards most of the season, and let's not forget 2016 is the year that Cam hurt his shoulder and never returned to form. 

We were back in the playoffs the next season once we were able to field a line that had actual NFL level talent on it, but then all of our WRs got hurt/weren't very good (Gettleman gets some blame for this) and that cost us the playoff game against the saints. 

18 was When Hurney had control again and that's when the wheels started falling completely off and Cam's shoulder got reaggravated and.

Like it or not, Gettleman has probably been the team's best GM even if it's not saying much. 

Objectively speaking, the most successful...

Granted, when your list of other contenders consists of a guy that's only been at it for two years and Marty Hurney, it's not exactly like you've got stiff competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hurney Backups weren't even JAGs man, half of them were out of the league before their rookie contracts were up.

And it's a little disingenuous to call guys like Norwell, Turner, Short, Lotulelei, Oher, Harper, Tillman, Coleman, and Cotchery JAGs. All were good to great that season and major contributors to the team that season.

 

I apologize.  It appears I accidentally hijacked the thread.  

I'll just say this:  I think we are looking at it from two different perspectives.  I agree with you that those players are not JAGs, so I see your point.  I hope you will see mine as well.  Those same players were mostly short-lived patches while practically every position overall weakened during Gettleman's time here.

Oher, for example was wonderful that one year as you said.  Overall, would you really classify his time in Carolina as a success?  How was the position of LT during and after Gettleman's term?  Holding on to Oher for waaaaay too long directly led to a terrible, desperate and horribly expensive decision to bring in Matt Kalil.  He made the tough decision to let Smitty go, but what did he do to shore up the position.  He made the tough decision to let Josh Norman go and then we had to practically waste a draft to try and fix it while starting an all-rookie CB crew.

So, yes, I see your points.  They are good points and I'm sure you can bring up more good points.  But overall, I just cannot agree that he was the best GM we've had.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, coffee said:

I apologize.  It appears I accidentally hijacked the thread.  

I'll just say this:  I think we are looking at it from two different perspectives.  I agree with you that those players are not JAGs, so I see your point.  I hope you will see mine as well.  Those same players were mostly short-lived patches while practically every position overall weakened during Gettleman's time here.

Oher, for example was wonderful that one year as you said.  Overall, would you really classify his time in Carolina as a success?  How was the position of LT during and after Gettleman's term?  Holding on to Oher for waaaaay too long directly led to a terrible, desperate and horribly expensive decision to bring in Matt Kalil.  He made the tough decision to let Smitty go, but what did he do to shore up the position.  He made the tough decision to let Josh Norman go and then we had to practically waste a draft to try and fix it while starting an all-rookie CB crew.

So, yes, I see your points.  They are good points and I'm sure you can bring up more good points.  But overall, I just cannot agree that he was the best GM we've had.

Who would you vote for then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...