Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corrall

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

All the people banging on Matt Corral have no idea to this day who Matt Rhule is. We knew he would do this to Corral, Corral didn't want to be redshirted and with the right coach Corral could start.

What about his college career says he's not starter material? Nothing. Football is football, your supposed learn something new all the time so all this has to do with is Rhules beliefs.

What Rhule believes can't win more than six games in this league. Not Corrals fault he's being redshirted and that decision was made we'll before he ever stepped on the field because our coach loves him some used underwear and half eaten ham sandwiches.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

Corral is gonna be fine. Tools are there. He needs time. 

 

People are spoiled by the QBs of the recent decade and forget that most of the QBs not that long ago weren't ready as rookies and even the ones that were needed a couple years to grow into the legends we know them to be today.

Corral may yet flop, but nobody should expect him to be starter material this year or even next.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not seeing it. He's the worst of the rookie QBs I've watched. He has a quick release and decent mobility but everything else is... rough.

It’s mental, once the game slows down for him, look out. Quick release goes a long way in the NFL

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, pdub0702 said:

Corral hasn’t got the reps..even so, having PJ and him compete for reps is simple stupid. Coral was drafted on potential that you can develop..PJ has already developed. Wasting rep on PJ hurts Corrals develop 

Hear hear, pisses me off we wasted those valuable reps in camp. Corrall would have been further along

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not seeing it. He's the worst of the rookie QBs I've watched. He has a quick release and decent mobility but everything else is... rough.

He's also the only one playing 4th fiddle and all that entails.

You obviously don't  know the history of many rookie QBs in real games, much less the preseason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • The Third Reich
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • UnluckyforSome
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...