Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person: Panthers expected to name Baker Mayfield Week 1 starter.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, shaqattaq said:

I'm not going to say that Rhule is incapable of making good decisions, but he has set a precedent of making some bad ones. If a dog bites me a few times, it doesn't me he'll bite me every time, but I sure as hell ain't going to trust him enough to try to pet him.

Yeah that's fine and that's the type of stuff you would incorporate into Rhule's overall evaluation as to whether you think he's a good coach or not.  But you should still be able to separate your overall opinions of Rhule from your opinions on any individual action he takes.  I'm not arguing that we should blindly trust Rhule, I'm saying we should be objective and levelheaded enough to not let our opinion of Rhule poison our ability to evaluate an individual move beyond simply the person making it.  If Rhule traded a conditional 2029 7th round pick for Pat Mahomes, could we agree that's an awesome move?  Or would we pause and say "wait a second....this is Rhule we're talking about...nothing he does makes sense!  He must have gotten screwed somehow.  TERRIBLE MOVE!".

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

No his logic is Sam Darnold is a hellofa great quarterback compared to you.

Likewise Matt Rhule is a a hellofa great NFL coach compared to you.

Or, Marty Hurney sure is a hellfoa great GM compared to you.

Personally, I'm not sure how you got Sam Darnold must be a great quarterback with what he wrote. Did you not read it? Did you drop out after 3rd grade? I don't think what he wrote was hard to understand so I'm befuddled at your conclusion.

Setting aside the personal stuff, here's the thing...

Darnold doesn't have to be a better quarterback than me. he needs to be better than Baker Mayfield.

Rhule doesn't need to be better coach than me. he needs to be better than Bill Belichick...or whomever else we happen to be facing this week.

Marty Hurney doesn't need to be a better GM than me. he needs to be better than whoever the Commanders are facing this season.

We've been over the whole "they're professionals so they know more than you"  suggestion numerous times on this board, and it's always been found to be a silly argument for reasons like those stated above.

Being smarter than me or any other random fan is a pretty low bar to clear.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I'm not going to say that Rhule is incapable of making good decisions, but he has set a precedent of making some bad ones. If a dog bites me a few times, it doesn't me he'll bite me every time, but I sure as hell ain't going to trust him enough to try to pet him.

Pretty much...

Matt Rhule's decision making has led us to pretty sad results. It'd be pretty hard to argue otherwise. That doesn't mean every single decision he's made was bad anymore than every playcall in a losing effort needing to be a terrible choice.

But when there are enough of them that you consistently don't get the results you want, well...

Can he get better? It's possible. Likewise, the aforementioned Sam Darnold could suddenly become a great quarterback and lead us to multiple victories.

A lot of us just don't see either of those things happening.

And logically, why should we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

If Rhule traded a conditional 2029 7th round pick for Pat Mahomes, could we agree that's an awesome move?  Or would we pause and say "wait a second....this is Rhule we're talking about...nothing he does makes sense!  He must have gotten screwed somehow.  TERRIBLE MOVE!".

No, no. Fitt did that.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Setting aside the personal stuff, here's the thing...

Darnold doesn't have to be a better quarterback than me. he needs to be better than Baker Mayfield.

Rhule doesn't need to be better coach than me. he needs to be better than Bill Belichick...or whomever else we happen to be facing this week.

Marty Hurney doesn't need to be a better GM than me. he needs to be better than whoever the Commanders are facing this season.

We've been over the whole "they're professionals so they know more than you"  suggestion numerous times on this board, and it's always been found to be a silly argument for reasons like those stated above.

Being smarter than me or any other random fan is a pretty low bar to clear.

Thing is, why did you respond to the side note at all? It just made you look dumb, imho. I don't disagree it's a bad argument, but you didn't address that and instead made a statement that made you look like you can't understand basic logic. It was an odd response from you.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

This is a fuging fire post.. And if ppl would say before evaluating a move.. "I hate Rhule and everything he does so this is way I feel this way".. Instead of trying to hide behind some facade of expertise and non facts to poo on a move.. I can take there opinion more seriously...

Jmo

Did Chip Kelly have this many stans in the Eagles fanbase? Hell at least he actually won some games. Back to back five win seasons. Three divisional wins in two years. Matt Rhule doesn't need you to defend his honor he needs his team to perform better because he's been calling the shots.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

No his logic is Sam Darnold is a hellofa great quarterback compared to you.

Likewise Matt Rhule is a a hellofa great NFL coach compared to you.

Or, Marty Hurney sure is a hellfoa great GM compared to you.

Personally, I'm not sure how you got Sam Darnold must be a great quarterback with what he wrote. Did you not read it? Did you drop out after 3rd grade? I don't think what he wrote was hard to understand so I'm befuddled at your conclusion.

This without the personal attacks..

Exactly..

Brian Scalabrine was a below avg. NBA but put up MJ numbers at the Ymca...  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

Thing is, why did you respond to the side note at all? It just made you look dumb, imho. I don't disagree it's a bad argument, but you didn't address that and instead made a statement that made you look like you can't understand basic logic. It was an odd response from you.

Here's the exact quote...

Ppl poo on Tommy Wiseu for "The Room" and how bad it is.. But I got to give credit for the guy still making money off the worst movie ever made... They actually have nights still in movie theaters where ppl travel and pay to watch it.. So while you "think" you know this person and that person isn't good at something.. The fact that they've done it and got paid for it gives them more credibility then you..

So within this paragraph, there's an argument that someone can be considered good at something because they made money doing it, as well as the notion that you need to be an expert in that same field to know when someone does something poorly.

Both of those are really dumb arguments. I only addressed the first because frankly, I found that sufficient.

Now I've addressed both.

And also, thanks to the posts from guys like Wow and others, we're back to wasting time talking about the people doing the posting rather than the actual topic, just like what pissed off our mod @rayzoryesterday.

Sheesh 🙄

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I'm not going to say that Rhule is incapable of making good decisions, but he has set a precedent of making some bad ones. If a dog bites me a few times, it doesn't me he'll bite me every time, but I sure as hell ain't going to trust him enough to try to pet him.

I can agree with this and don't have a problem if you base your criticism on this..

But when ppl try to fake expertise on how to run a TC and rep Distribution.. As the base of their criticism.. I'm asking them what is your creditable experience on the subject. ..

(What was the rep Distribution for this player and that player..

How was TC run for this team and that team..)

Show your work!!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Did Chip Kelly have this many stans in the Eagles fanbase? Hell at least he actually won some games. Back to back five win seasons. Three divisional wins in two years. Matt Rhule doesn't need you to defend his honor he needs his team to perform better because he's been calling the shots.

And then the comeback is 

"YOU MUST BE A RHULE FAN" BECAUSE YOU DISAGREE WITH MY OPINION " DUH DUH DUH!@

Instead of backing your poo up with actually facts and valid points...

Lmao

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's the exact quote...

Ppl poo on Tommy Wiseu for "The Room" and how bad it is.. But I got to give credit for the guy still making money off the worst movie ever made... They actually have nights still in movie theaters where ppl travel and pay to watch it.. So while you "think" you know this person and that person isn't good at something.. The fact that they've done it and got paid for it gives them more credibility then you..

So within this paragraph, there's an argument that someone can be considered good at something because they made money doing it, as well as the notion that you need to be an expert in that same field to know when someone does something poorly.

Both of those are really dumb arguments. I only addressed the first because frankly, I found that sufficient.

Now I've addressed both.

And also, thanks to the posts from guys like Wow and others, we're back to wasting time talking about the people doing the posting rather than the actual topic, just like what pissed off our mod @rayzoryesterday.

Sheesh 🙄

No the point is other then "I can see this because I've watch football for 50 years" and By my watching football I can see he isn't good"

Instead actual data and information to Express why this move or that move is wrong...

You're basically saying "Rhule made the move so its wrong.. And I know this because I watch football"..

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Yeah that's fine and that's the type of stuff you would incorporate into Rhule's overall evaluation as to whether you think he's a good coach or not.  But you should still be able to separate your overall opinions of Rhule from your opinions on any individual action he takes.  I'm not arguing that we should blindly trust Rhule, I'm saying we should be objective and levelheaded enough to not let our opinion of Rhule poison our ability to evaluate an individual move beyond simply the person making it.  If Rhule traded a conditional 2029 7th round pick for Pat Mahomes, could we agree that's an awesome move?  Or would we pause and say "wait a second....this is Rhule we're talking about...nothing he does makes sense!  He must have gotten screwed somehow.  TERRIBLE MOVE!".

images.jpeg.cc5287967d1e1c04f76e9a04eaeb1727.jpeg

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...