Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corral assessment from Simms


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s only preseason but this hurts my soul 🤕 

Highest QB Rating among rookies this preseason

Kenny Pickett         138.6 
Skylar Thompson   121.3
Desmond Ridder     98.0
Brock Purdy             86.0
Malik Willis              80.5
Bailey Zappe            72.1
Sam Howell              69.1
Matt Corral              49.3

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Again, out of all the rookie QBs I watched this preseason - he was the least impressive. The game and moment looked to big for him and he was always just running around.  I know the OL didn’t help but the other QBs I watched were playing with and against scrubs as well. 

probably the worst possible start for his career here we could have asked for and if he has substance abuse issues they are gonna get tested this year with him on the bench. 
 

also should have drafted Sam Howell 

Name the QBs and I’d bet you they were playing with the second unit, guys that will actually be on the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NAS said:

It’s only preseason but this hurts my soul 🤕 

Highest QB Rating among rookies this preseason

Kenny Pickett         138.6 
Skylar Thompson   121.3
Desmond Ridder     98.0
Brock Purdy             86.0
Malik Willis              80.5
Bailey Zappe            72.1
Sam Howell              69.1
Matt Corral              49.3

But its not rhules fault

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

But its not rhules fault

Ironically I think this snapshot exposes the flaws in your argument.  Yes Rhule is at the bottom where he belongs, but if the head coach is directly and unilaterally responsible for rookie QB performance (which you've made pretty clear is your stance), then that would make your head coach rankings look like:

1. Mike Tomlin

2. Mike McDaniel

3. Arthur Smith

4. Kyle Shanahan

5. Mike Vrabel

6. Bill Belichick

7. Ron Rivera

8. Matt Rhule

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

Ironically I think this snapshot exposes the flaws in your argument.  Yes Rhule is at the bottom where he belongs, but if the head coach is directly and unilaterally responsible for rookie QB performance (which you've made pretty clear is your stance), then that would make your head coach rankings look like:

1. Mike Tomlin

2. Mike McDaniel

3. Arthur Smith

4. Kyle Shanahan

5. Mike Vrabel

6. Bill Belichick

7. Ron Rivera

8. Matt Rhule

you dont think a head coach is directly responsible for the development of qbs?  Plus I never meant to imply he was the sole one coaching him but he is damn sure the one that is involved in the planning of the development. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you dont think a head coach is directly responsible for the development of qbs?  Plus I never meant to imply he was the sole one coaching him but he is damn sure the one that is involved in the planning of the development. 

 

I would say it depends on the coach right?  Some of the defensive minded coaches (like Bill) let their OCs and QB coaches handle the QBs.  For example I bet Josh McDaniels did way more for the development of Mac Jones than Bill did.  On the other end, Shahan is probably heavily involved in Lance's development.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I would say it depends on the coach right?  Some of the defensive minded coaches (like Bill) let their OCs and QB coaches handle the QBs.  For example I bet Josh McDaniels did way more for the development of Mac Jones than Bill did.  On the other end, Shahan is probably heavily involved in Lance's development.  

It was 110% a BB decision to cut cam and roll with mac as a starter.  He knew this work for mac and to not have to worry about cam. 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It was 110% a BB decision to cut cam and roll with mac as a starter.  He knew this work for mac and to not have to worry about cam. 

Sure, but it was because McDaniels had Mac Jones ready to go by week one.  Mac is the kind of QB McDaniels wanted, not Cam.  Hoyer, Jimmy G, Brady, and now Carr fit the precision pocket passers mold that he loves.  (clearly some on this list are MUCH better at it than the others).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, NAS said:

It’s only preseason but this hurts my soul 🤕 

Highest QB Rating among rookies this preseason

Kenny Pickett         138.6 
Skylar Thompson   121.3
Desmond Ridder     98.0
Brock Purdy             86.0
Malik Willis              80.5
Bailey Zappe            72.1
Sam Howell              69.1
Matt Corral              49.3

just preseason, but the amount of investment rhule has put in corral is pretty bad. he's been an afterthought. what does anyone expect? i mean rhule understandably has been preoccupied with that QB1 "competition", but this sure doesn't help the surprising reputation rhule has built for not doing a great job developing or getting invested in young players (unless they were baylor/temple guys).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

just preseason, but the amount of investment rhule has put in corral is pretty bad. he's been an afterthought. what does anyone expect? i mean rhule understandably has been preoccupied with that QB1 "competition", but this sure doesn't help the surprising reputation rhule has built for not doing a great job developing or getting invested in young players (unless they were baylor/temple guys).

Rhule cannot work and chew gum at the same time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I would say it depends on the coach right?  Some of the defensive minded coaches (like Bill) let their OCs and QB coaches handle the QBs.  For example I bet Josh McDaniels did way more for the development of Mac Jones than Bill did.  On the other end, Shahan is probably heavily involved in Lance's development.  

And this year, Belichick will be leaving it in the hands of Matt Patricia and Joe Judge.

 

 

Good luck, Mac 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...