Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Foreman is our 2


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

If you base anything around CMC receiving whatsoever you have to put Foreman at #2. His past catch rate % is between 80-100 every year. Chuba looks quick with straight line speed but is vaporized when he hits the D-line wall. All his college highlights were running through a wide open gap straight ahead for whatever yards who cares

chuba has terrible vision as well

on his screen left where he picked up the first down, he should have had another 10 yards but he deeked inside for some reason before going back outside. He very nearly didn't pick up the first down on a play he should have had it by 10-15

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean the bar for our #2 spot is basically can you catch an easy pass. 

wish they would have added a RB like Ameer before the season started last year instead of once CMC got hurt.  Same applies this year.  Stylistically, I think we should have that diverse pass catcher:runner to sub in for CMC and be there if he got hurt. 
 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I mean the bar for our #2 spot is basically can you catch an easy pass. 

wish they would have added a RB like Ameer before the season started last year instead of once CMC got hurt.  Same applies this year.  Stylistically, I think we should have that diverse pass catcher:runner to sub in for CMC and be there if he got hurt. 
 

In fairness, they have found solid replacements for CMC in successive years so there hasn't been a moment where they were fuged because we didn't have a capable RB or the ability to find one.

In a sense, RB production is quite easy to find. However it's basically impossible to replace what CMC creates as a player on offense.

Hence why I always rail against heavy investment into RB's. Production isn't hard to come by. Elite players are but they rarely stay available for extended stretches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

In fairness, they have found solid replacements for CMC in successive years so there hasn't been a moment where they were fuged because we didn't have a capable RB or the ability to find one.

In a sense, RB production is quite easy to find. However it's basically impossible to replace what CMC creates as a player on offense.

Hence why I always rail against heavy investment into RB's. Production isn't hard to come by. Elite players are but they rarely stay available for extended stretches.

Production appears nearly impossible to come by outside of CMC, though. Rhule as of now has hit on exactly one draft pick in three years, a rate that surely makes Marty Hurney cackle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Production appears nearly impossible to come by outside of CMC, though. Rhule as of now has hit on exactly one draft pick in three years, a rate that surely makes Marty Hurney cackle. 

I disagree. Mike Davis was extremely productive in 2020. In 2021 the combo of Hubbard and Abdullah was fairly productive.

Did most of those guys struggle running the ball compared to CMC? Absolutely. But, keep in mind CMC is an elite runner. He makes our awful OL blocking look halfway serviceable because of his greatness. 

Now that....you can't duplicate that with a draft pick, a free agent signing or a dumpster dive. The best you can do is improve the blocking situation so you don't NEED an elite runner to generate a capable rushing attack. THAT should be the focus of our building in the future. 

If we get a nasty, physical IOL, we won't even need a CMC to gash people in the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

chuba has terrible vision as well

on his screen left where he picked up the first down, he should have had another 10 yards but he deeked inside for some reason before going back outside. He very nearly didn't pick up the first down on a play he should have had it by 10-15

He also sucks at run blocking or just doesn't wanna do it. Week 1 when Baker scrambled he completely gave up on his guy and Baker had to do that baseball slide out of bounds when he could have easily jogged out after another 5 yards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

In fairness, they have found solid replacements for CMC in successive years so there hasn't been a moment where they were fuged because we didn't have a capable RB or the ability to find one.

In a sense, RB production is quite easy to find. However it's basically impossible to replace what CMC creates as a player on offense.

Hence why I always rail against heavy investment into RB's. Production isn't hard to come by. Elite players are but they rarely stay available for extended stretches.

I’m not advocating for heavy investment.  Just advocating for the type of depth.  We were able to find Ameer last season.  But it took weeks for him to start getting more involved and he never really got the volume he deserved minus CMC.  If he was already on the roster and locked into the 2 spot when CMC went down we would have been better off.  Ameer was the best RB on the team last year at the end but we didn’t have him ready to go and he wasn’t treated as such largely because he was a midseason add. 

If your offense build around CMC.  You should have a similar style RB IMO behind him so what you do doesn’t have to drastically change.  Hubbard can’t catch. 

Im talking 21 and now 22.  They did have it in 20 with Davis.  And the O didn’t implode in 20 when CMC went down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

I’m not advocating for heavy investment.  Just advocating for the type of depth.  We were able to find Ameer last season.  But it took weeks for him to start getting more involved and he never really got the volume he deserved minus CMC.  If he was already on the roster and locked into the 2 spot when CMC went down we would have been better off.  Ameer was the best RB on the team last year at the end but we didn’t have him ready to go and he wasn’t treated as such largely because he was a midseason add. 

If your offense build around CMC.  You should have a similar style RB IMO behind him so what you do doesn’t have to drastically change.  Hubbard can’t catch. 

Im talking 21 and now 22.  They did have it in 20 with Davis.  And the O didn’t implode in 20 when CMC went down. 

The Hubbard pick was like the LS pick. Just Rhule throwing darts at things he liked in college. We need a HB that can catch the ball and a HB that is a North South guy. Hubbard is neither. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...